most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-06-19T01:02:36Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/84138 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/84138/resubmit-paper-to-same-journal Ruke 2011-12-23T05:49:36Z 2011-12-23T09:06:42Z

<p>I recently have a paper rejected from a very good (but not the top) journal. The referee report said the result was good and certainly belong there, but he did not think I did enough to back up my claims (it was a rather long and harsh criticism at the exposition). Now I know for sure that my result is good and my proofs are correct, should I resubmit to the same journal after rewriting it.</p>

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/84138/resubmit-paper-to-same-journal/84139#84139 rview 2011-12-23T05:56:22Z 2011-12-23T05:56:22Z

<p>yes you should resubmit it</p>

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/84138/resubmit-paper-to-same-journal/84150#84150 Brendan McKay 2011-12-23T09:06:42Z 2011-12-23T09:06:42Z

<p>A paper can be accepted (maybe subject to minor changes), rejected with a request for certain major changes, or rejected outright. If your paper fits into the middle category (which the editor will usually make clear), you should do some major surgery on it and send it again to the same journal. If it is in the last category, do some major surgery on it and send it to a different journal. In neither case should you send it anywhere without changes after receiving a long negative report. Even if you disagree with it, you should take the report as evidence of how other specialist readers will regard your paper, including misunderstandings.</p>