Flat cover by a locally Noetherian scheme - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-25T05:33:12Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/83529http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/83529/flat-cover-by-a-locally-noetherian-schemeFlat cover by a locally Noetherian schemehadimath2011-12-15T15:52:01Z2011-12-17T16:44:41Z
<p>Les S be a scheme. Does there exist a faithfully flat morphism T to S with T a locally Noetherian scheme?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/83529/flat-cover-by-a-locally-noetherian-scheme/83602#83602Answer by Laurent Moret-Bailly for Flat cover by a locally Noetherian schemeLaurent Moret-Bailly2011-12-16T08:06:22Z2011-12-17T16:44:41Z<p>Note that if $T\to S$ is also quasicompact, then $S$ must be locally noetherian: this boils down to the well-known fact that if $A\to B$ is a faithfully flat ring homomorphism and $B$ is noetherian, then so is $A$.</p>
<p>This proves that Jason's example above is indeed a counterexample. More generally, any non-noetherian <em>local</em> scheme $S$ is a counterexample: if $T\to S$ is faithfully flat, there is an open affine $U\subset T$ which covers $S$.</p>
<p>EDIT: In fact, here is a complete answer ($S$ is any given scheme):</p>
<p>(1) The following are equivalent:<br>
(1a) There exists a locally noetherian scheme $T$ and a faithfully flat and quasicompact morphism $T\to S$.<br>
(1b) $S$ is locally noetherian.</p>
<p>(2) The following are equivalent:<br>
(2a) There exists a locally noetherian scheme $T$ and a faithfully flat morphism $T\to S$.<br>
(2b) For each $s\in S$, the ring <code>$\mathcal{O}_{S,s}$</code> is noetherian.</p>
<p>Proof: exercise. To show that (2b) implies (2a), take $T=\coprod_{s\in S}\mathrm{Spec}(\mathcal{O}_{S,s})$.</p>