When is the Wendt binomial circulant determinant divisible by 3? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-20T06:36:46Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/83279http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/83279/when-is-the-wendt-binomial-circulant-determinant-divisible-by-3When is the Wendt binomial circulant determinant divisible by 3?aorq2011-12-12T20:40:40Z2011-12-13T02:48:54Z
<p>The Wendt binomial circulant determinant $W_n$ can be defined quite simply as a resultant:
$$ W_n = \operatorname{res}(x^n-1, (x+1)^n-1). $$
Truer to its name, one may also define it as the determinant $\det(A)$ of the circulant matrix with entries $A_{i,j} = \binom{n}{\lvert i-j\rvert}$.</p>
<p>The Wendt determinant was of interest historically to number theory because of its connection to Fermat's last theorem. The sequence is available on the OEIS as <a href="http://oeis.org/A048954" rel="nofollow">A048954</a>, beginning as follows: $$1, -3, 28, -375, 3751, 0, 6835648, -1343091375, \dotsc$$</p>
<p>I have recently become interested in some of the prime factors of the Wendt determinant, <a href="http://www.numericana.com/data/wendt.htm" rel="nofollow">a list of which</a> is available online. Specifically, I am wondering: <strong>for which $n$, relatively prime to 6*, is $W_n$ divisible by $3$?</strong> I am interested in any result that gives a sufficient condition for $W_n$ to <em>not</em> be divisible by 3.</p>
<p>The small $n$, relatively prime to $6$, for which $W_n$ is divisible by $3$ are multiples of 13, 121, 671, and 757 (note that $W_m$ divides $W_n$ if $m$ divides $n$). I was not successful in finding this sequence or any other related sequence in the OEIS.</p>
<p>* I ask for relatively prime to $6$ for some technical reasons. Every sixth entry is zero, and also every even entry is known to be divisible by three. I am also interested in which of the even entries is twice divisible by $3$, ie divisible by $9$.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/83279/when-is-the-wendt-binomial-circulant-determinant-divisible-by-3/83306#83306Answer by Greg Martin for When is the Wendt binomial circulant determinant divisible by 3?Greg Martin2011-12-13T01:38:39Z2011-12-13T01:38:39Z<p>The resultant $W_n$ is a multiple of $3$ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resultant#Properties" rel="nofollow">if and only if</a> the two polynomials $x^n-1$ and $(x+1)^n-1$ share a common irreducible factor when considered as polynomials in $({\mathbb Z}/3{\mathbb Z})[x]$. </p>
<p>Suppose now that $n>3$ is an odd prime. Factoring out the obviously unique factors $x-1$ and $x$, respectively, we see that $3\mid W_n$ if and only if $(x^n-1)/(x-1) = \Phi_n(x)$ and $((x+1)^n-1)/x = \Phi_n(x+1)$ share a common irreducible factor.</p>
<p>Suppose further that $n$ is an odd prime for which $3$ happens to be a primitive root (mod $n$). Then $\Phi_n(x)$ is irreducible in $({\mathbb Z}/3{\mathbb Z})[x]$ (see for example <a href="http://math.columbia.edu/~pugin/Teaching/USemBlog_files/CycloRed.pdf" rel="nofollow">the Corollary on page 2</a>); in particular, $\Phi_n(x)$ shares no common irreducible factor with $\Phi_n(x+1)$.</p>
<p>This gives a sufficient condition for $W_n$ not to be a multiple of $3$: if $n$ is a prime for which $3$ is a primitive root. There should be infinitely many such $n$, but unfortunately we can only prove this under the assumption of a generalized Riemann hypothesis. The first few such $n$ are $5, 7, 17, 19, 29, 31, 43, 53, 79, 89$.</p>