Piecewise constant functions with zero average - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-25T00:09:55Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/82481 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/82481/piecewise-constant-functions-with-zero-average Piecewise constant functions with zero average Marco Mazzucchelli 2011-12-02T16:24:39Z 2011-12-03T08:23:56Z <p>Consider $0=t_0\leq t_1\leq...\leq t_n=1$, $f_0,...,f_{n-1}\in\mathbb{Z}$ and $F:[0,1]\to\mathbb{R}$ be such that </p> <p>1) $F\equiv f_i$ on the interval $(t_i,t_{t+1})$, for all $i=0,...,n-1$,</p> <p>2) $\displaystyle \int_0^1 F(t) dt=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(t_{i+1}-t_i)f_i=0$.</p> <p>Does there exist an arbitrarily large prime number $p$ and a positive integer $k=k(p)$ such that $q:=p^k$ satisfies</p> <p>$\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^{q-1} F\left(\frac{i}{q}\right)=0$ ?</p> <p>I know that the answer is YES when all the $t_j$'s are rational number: if $t_j=\frac{p_j}{q_j}$, then it suffices to choose $q\equiv 1$ mod $\mathrm{lcm}(q_1,...,q_{n-1})$.</p> <p>Any idea for the general case?</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/82481/piecewise-constant-functions-with-zero-average/82515#82515 Answer by GH for Piecewise constant functions with zero average GH 2011-12-02T22:38:45Z 2011-12-03T08:23:56Z <p>Thanks to the comments of George Lowther and Greg Martin (for which I am most grateful), I can now show that the answer is YES for infinitely many primes $q$.</p> <p><strong>Theorem 1.</strong> Let $t_1\dots,t_{n-1}$ be any finite set of real numbers.Then for any $\epsilon>0$ and any integer $r>0$ there are infinitely many primes $q\equiv 1\pmod{r}$ such that $$\|(q-1)t_i\|&lt;\epsilon,\qquad i=1,\dots,n-1.\tag{1}$$ Here $\|x\|$ stands for the distance of $x$ to the nearest integer.</p> <p><strong>Proof.</strong> Without loss of generality, the numbers $1,t_1,\dots,t_{n-1}$ are linearly independent over $\mathbb{Q}$. Indeed, we can express each of them as a $\mathbb{Z}$-linear combination from a suitable basis $\frac{1}{s},t_1^*,\dots,t_{m-1}^*$ of their $\mathbb{Q}$-linear span, where $s>0$ is an integer. Then the statement for $t_1,\dots,t_{n-1}$ follows from the statement for $t_1^*,\dots,t_{m-1}^*$ (with $\mathrm{lcm}(r,s)$ in place of $r$). When the elements of $1,t_1,\dots,t_{n-1}$ are linearly independent over $\mathbb{Q}$, the statement follows from the stronger result that the vectors $(qt_1,\dots,qt_{n-1})$ are dense modulo $1$, as $q$ runs through the primes such that $q\equiv 1\pmod{r}$. This result is essentially due to Vinogradov, with technical improvements by Vaughan and Harman. See Theorem 4 in Harman: Diophantine approximation with primes, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 39 (1989), 405–413. Well, Harman does not have the condition $q\equiv 1\pmod{r}$, but it seems straightforward to incorporate it.</p> <p><strong>Theorem 2.</strong> Let $t_i$, $f_i$, $F$ be as in the original question but without the assumption $f_i\in\mathbb{Z}$. Then for any $\epsilon>0$ there is a prime $q$ such that $$\left|\sum_{j=1}^{q-1}F\left(\frac{j}{q}\right)\right|&lt; \epsilon.$$ In particular, if $F$ is integer valued and $\epsilon=1$, then the left hand side is zero.</p> <p><strong>Proof.</strong> Assume that $\epsilon>0$ is sufficiently small, namely $$\epsilon&lt;\|t_i\|,\qquad i=1,\dots,n-1.\tag{2}$$ By Theorem 1, there is a prime $q$ such that (1) holds. Observe that $$\sum_{j=1}^{q-1}F\left(\frac{j}{q}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{n-2}f_i\bigl([qt_{i+1}]-[qt_i]\bigr)+f_{n-1}\bigl(q-1-[qt_{n-1}]\bigr),$$ where $[x]$ stands for the integral part of $x$. Here we used that no $\frac{j}{q}$ coincides with any $t_i$, as follows from (1) and (2). We subtract $$0=(q-1)\int_0^1 F(t)dt=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}f_i\bigl((q-1)t_{i+1}-(q-1)t_i\bigr),$$ then with the notation $$\tilde t_i:=[qt_i]-(q-1)t_i,\qquad i=0,\dots,n-1,$$ we get $$\sum_{j=1}^{q-1}F\left(\frac{j}{q}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{n-2}f_i\bigl(\tilde t_{i+1}-\tilde t_i\bigr)-f_{n-1}\tilde t_{n-1}=\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}(f_{i-1}-f_i)\tilde t_i.$$ By (1) we can write $(q-1)t_i=n_i+e_i$ with $n_i\in\mathbb{Z}$ and $|e_i|&lt;\epsilon$. Then $$qt_i = n_i+t_i+e_i,\qquad i=1,\dots,n-1,$$ whence by (2), that is by $\epsilon&lt;\min(t_1,1-t_{n-1})$, we have $[qt_i]=n_i$, so that $\tilde t_i=-e_i$. It follows that $$\sum_{j=1}^{q-1}F\left(\frac{j}{q}\right)=\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}(f_i-f_{i-1})e_i,$$ whence $$\left|\sum_{j=1}^{q-1}F\left(\frac{j}{q}\right)\right|&lt;\epsilon\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}|f_i-f_{i-1}|.$$ The right hand side can be made arbitrary small, so we are done.</p>