two real closed fields- algebraic elements - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-20T07:48:38Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/82071http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/82071/two-real-closed-fields-algebraic-elementstwo real closed fields- algebraic elementsmosen2011-11-28T11:11:40Z2011-12-12T15:28:41Z
<p>If R_1\subset R_2 are two real closed fields (R_2 is an extension of R_1), then is it always the case that R_1 contains {R_2}_alg; By the latter I mean algebraic elements of R_2.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/82071/two-real-closed-fields-algebraic-elements/82075#82075Answer by mosen for two real closed fields- algebraic elementsmosen2011-11-28T12:38:52Z2011-11-28T12:38:52Z<p>I think I've found it out. If R_1\subset R_2 are two real closed fields, then (R_1)_alg should be the same as (R_2)_alg, since otherwise (R_2)_alg would be a proper real extension of (R_1)_alg contradicting real-closedness of (R_1)_alg.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/82071/two-real-closed-fields-algebraic-elements/83247#83247Answer by Hurkyl for two real closed fields- algebraic elementsHurkyl2011-12-12T15:28:41Z2011-12-12T15:28:41Z<p>What do you mean by "algebraic elements of $R_2$"? Do you mean those elements that are algebraic over $R_1$? Then the answer is yes. There is a straightforward proof: the only algebraic extension of $R_1$ is $R_1[i]$, and $i \notin R_2$. (where $i^2 = -1$)</p>