Showing the derivative of this function is equal to $0$ a.e - MathOverflow [closed]most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T04:52:42Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/81411http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/81411/showing-the-derivative-of-this-function-is-equal-to-0-a-eShowing the derivative of this function is equal to $0$ a.eLeitingok2011-11-20T11:29:14Z2011-11-20T16:25:25Z
<p>Define $f:[0,1]\to [0,1]$ by</p>
<p>$f(0)=0$ , $f(x)=\sum\limits_{r_n\le x} 2^{ -n } $ with $0\lt x\le 1 $</p>
<p>where $[ r_n]_{n\in \mathbb{Z^+} } = \mathbb{ Q} \cap (0,1) $.</p>
<p>How to show that the derivative $f'(x)=0$ a.e.?</p>
<p>I can show this function is increasing and discontinuous at every rational, and how to word on?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/81411/showing-the-derivative-of-this-function-is-equal-to-0-a-e/81424#81424Answer by Pietro Majer for Showing the derivative of this function is equal to $0$ a.ePietro Majer2011-11-20T14:14:39Z2011-11-20T16:25:25Z<p>The function $f(x)$ is $\mu([0,x])$ where $\mu$ is the radon measure $\sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z} _ +} 2^{-n}\delta _ {q_n}$, and $\mu$ is singular w.r.to the Lebesgue measure $\lambda$ (in fact, $\operatorname{supp}(\mu)=(0,1)\cap\mathbb{Q}$). So the absolutely continuous part $\mu ^ a$ w.r.to $\lambda$ is zero, and the Radon-Nikodym derivative $d\mu ^ a/d \lambda$ is also zero; but this coincides a.e. with the derivative of $f$.
Note that (depending on the particular chosen enumeration of $(0,1)\cap\mathbb{Q}$) there might be infinitely many irrational points $x$ where $f$ is continuous and derivable with any value of $f'(x)$; a Lebesgue null set though.</p>
<p><strong>edit</strong>. A more elementary argument. Consider the nested family of open nbd's of $(0,1)\cap\mathbb{Q}\ ,$ $$A_\epsilon:=\cup_{n\in\mathbb{Z} _ + } (r_n- \epsilon 2^{-n/3},r_n+ \epsilon 2^{-n/3})\ , \qquad \epsilon > 0\ . $$
So $|A _\epsilon|=O(\epsilon)$ and $A:=\cap _ {\epsilon > 0} A _ \epsilon$ has measure zero. Let $x \in (0,1) \setminus A$: There exists $\epsilon > 0$ such that for any $n\in\mathbb{Z} _ +$ there holds $ \epsilon 2^{-n/3}\le |x-r _ n|$. Thus, for any $y\in (0,1)$
$$|f(x)-f(y)|\le \sum_{|x- r _ n|\le|x- y| } 2^{-n}= \frac{1}{\epsilon^2}\sum_{|x- r _ n|\le|x- y| } 2^{-n/3}(\epsilon 2^{-n/3})^2\le $$$$\le \frac{1}{\epsilon^2}\bigg(\sum_{n=1}^\infty 2^{-n/3}\bigg)|x-y|^2= \frac{|x-y|^2}{\epsilon^2(2^{1/3}-1))}\ ,$$ showing that $f'(x)=0\ .$</p>