Dedekind eta function history - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-06-19T16:34:57Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/7971 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/7971/dedekind-eta-function-history Dedekind eta function history Jonah Sinick 2009-12-06T06:20:24Z 2009-12-19T19:39:14Z <p>What is the early history of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dedekind%5Feta%5Ffunction" rel="nofollow">Dedekind eta function</a>? In particular, why is it called the <em>Dedekind</em> eta function? Ramanujan's paper on the 24th power of the Dedekind eta function had appeared by 1916 and I have a reasonably good understanding what happened after that, in the other direction I know that by 1775 Euler had consider the Dedekind eta function divided by q<sup>1/24</sup> in his work which led to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagonal%5Fnumber%5Ftheorem" rel="nofollow">pentagonal number theorem</a>, but what happened between Euler and Ramanujan that led to the introduction of the factor of q<sup>1/24</sup> (which gives a half integer weight modular form) and the attachment of Dedekind's name to it?</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/7971/dedekind-eta-function-history/7994#7994 Answer by Thomas Riepe for Dedekind eta function history Thomas Riepe 2009-12-06T12:52:42Z 2009-12-06T12:52:42Z <p>Perhaps <a href="http://www.keyifkafe.net/matematik/43654-kroneckers-jugendtraum-and-modular-functions.html" rel="nofollow" title="book">Vladut's book</a> gives infos on that, the old <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enzyklop%C3%A4die_der_mathematischen_Wissenschaften" rel="nofollow" title="wiki">Enzyklopädie der mathematischen Wissenschaften</a> usually contain detailed infos, then there are Klein's history books and Klein/Fricke's 2 vol.s on modular functions. </p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/7971/dedekind-eta-function-history/8001#8001 Answer by Ila Varma for Dedekind eta function history Ila Varma 2009-12-06T14:31:38Z 2009-12-06T14:31:38Z <p>I believe Dedekind introduced in the late 19th century in relation to elliptic functions and expressed them in terms of what is now known as Dedekind sums. Even though both the Euler function and the eta function are symmetric on the modular group, they may have been studied in different contexts where Dedekind's would be considered more directly related to modular forms. </p> <p>In the pentagonal number theorem, there's no assumption or use of $x = e^{2\pi i z}$ in his function $\prod_n (1-x^n)$, and maybe it was not considered in relation to elliptic functions or modular forms at the time. Of course, the generalization of the pentagonal number theorem is to the triple product formula which is very much related to theta functions and modular forms as well. </p> <p>If you notice on the wikipedia article for the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%5Ffunction" rel="nofollow">Euler function</a>, they mention the two being related by a "Ramanujan's identity."</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/7971/dedekind-eta-function-history/8009#8009 Answer by José Figueroa-O'Farrill for Dedekind eta function history José Figueroa-O'Farrill 2009-12-06T16:50:39Z 2009-12-06T16:50:39Z <p>I believe that Dedekind introduced this function in <em>Schreiben an Herrn Borchardt über die Theorie der elliptischen Modulfunktionen</em> which was published in Crelle's Journal in 1877. The complete references is <em>Journal für reine und angewandte Mathematik</em>, <strong>83</strong> (1877) 265-292 and it is reprinted in volume 1 of his collected works with a postscript by Fricke explaining that this work remained largely unknown for some time. He also cites a later paper by F. Klein with substantial overlap.</p> <p>The relevant equation in the paper is equation (24). Right after it he bemoans his lack of luck in finding the explicit expression for the eta function from the definition or without the use of theta functions:</p> <blockquote> <p>Allein es ist mir bisher nicht geglückt, diese Darstellung von $\eta(\omega)$ als explizite Funktion von $\omega$ lediglich aus ihrer obigen Definition, also ohne die Hilfe der Theorie der $\vartheta$-Funktionen abzuleiten.</p> </blockquote> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/7971/dedekind-eta-function-history/8010#8010 Answer by Jonah Sinick for Dedekind eta function history Jonah Sinick 2009-12-06T16:56:20Z 2009-12-06T16:56:20Z <p>After some searching I found some relevant references:</p> <p>H. Rademacher and A. Whiteman, “Theorems on Dedekind sums,” Amer. J. Math. 63 (1941), 377–407.</p> <p>Arias-de-Reyna, J. Riemann's fragment on limit values of elliptic modular functions. Ramanujan J. 8 (2004), no. 1, 57--123. </p> <p>Dedekind's paper is titled "Erlauterungen zu den vorstehenden Fragmenten" and was published published in Riemann's collected works. In this paper Dedekind attempts to elucidate Riemann's “Fragmente uber die Grenzfalle der Elliptischen Modulfunctionen,” </p> <p>It looks like Dedekind's introduction of the eta function was inspired by these fragmentary notes of Riemann. It would take me some time to parse the relevant issues (e.g. to what extent did Riemann know the Dedekind eta function, how might things have seemed to Dedekind, etc.) and I will not do so at the moment, but am happy to have found these for future reference.</p>