Is there a section disjoint from 0, 1 and infinity on the projective line - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-20T06:38:53Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/76206http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/76206/is-there-a-section-disjoint-from-0-1-and-infinity-on-the-projective-lineIs there a section disjoint from 0, 1 and infinity on the projective lineTamed2011-09-23T13:44:00Z2011-10-02T03:29:49Z
<p>Let $K$ be a number field with ring of integers $O_K$. Is there a section of $\mathbf{P}^1_{O_K}$ over $O_K$ whose image is disjoint from $0$, $1$ and $\infty$? If $K=\mathbf{Q}$ this is not possible because any integer $n>1$ is divisible by a prime number. What if $K \neq \mathbf{Q}$?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/76206/is-there-a-section-disjoint-from-0-1-and-infinity-on-the-projective-line/76963#76963Answer by Noam D. Elkies for Is there a section disjoint from 0, 1 and infinity on the projective lineNoam D. Elkies2011-10-02T03:29:49Z2011-10-02T03:29:49Z<p>Such sections are tantamount to solutions of the unit equation $u + u' = 1$ in $O_K^*$. This is indeed impossible for $K = {\bf Q}$, when $O_K = {\bf Z}$ and the only units are $\pm 1$; but there can be such solutions for other number fields $K$, though it is known that in each $K$ there are only finitely many solutions.</p>
<p>A "section of ${\bf P}^1_{O_K}$ over $O_K^{\phantom|}$" is a $K$-point of the projective line, i.e. either $\infty$ or a field element. The "sections" $u$ disjoint from $\infty$ are precisely the algebraic integers, because $u$ "intersects $\infty$ at the prime $\wp$" <strong>iff</strong> $u$ has negative valuation at $\wp$, and the algebraic integers are precisely the field elements none of whose valuations are negative. Likewise $u$ is disjoint from $0$ <strong>iff</strong> $u$ has no positive valuation at any $\wp$, and disjoint from $1$ <strong>iff</strong> $u-1$ has no positive valuations. Therefore, $u$ is disjoint from $0$, $1$, and $\infty$ <strong>iff</strong> both $u$ and $u-1$ are units, which is to say <strong>iff</strong> $(u,1-u)$ is a solution of the unit equation.</p>
<p>One easy way to get such $(K,u)$ is to make $u(1-u)$ a unit in some number field $F$, say $\epsilon$, because then $u$ and $1-u$ are themselves algebraic integers in a number field containing $F$ with degree at most $2$ (they're the roots of the monic quadratic polynomial $x^2-x+\epsilon$ over $O_F$), and thus units because they divide the unit $\epsilon$. For example, taking $F={\bf Q}$ and $\epsilon = 1$ or $-1$ we recover the simplest solutions of the unit equation: the sixth roots of unity $(1 \pm \sqrt{-3})/2$, and the golden ratio $(1 \pm \sqrt{5})/2$. More generally, if $x^{m+n} - x^m = \epsilon$ for some unit $\epsilon$ and positive integers $m,n$ then both $x$ and $1-x^n$ are units, so we may take $u = x^n$. </p>