Cayley's Theorem regarding marked trees - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T00:49:00Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/75878http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/75878/cayleys-theorem-regarding-marked-treesCayley's Theorem regarding marked treesunknown (google)2011-09-19T17:51:31Z2011-09-19T19:22:44Z
<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I have the following proof of Cayley's Theorem: <a href="http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/821/sformulaproof.png" rel="nofollow">Proof</a>.</p>
<p>This proof counts orderings of directed edges of rooted trees in two ways and concludes the number of rooted trees with directed edges of order $n$.</p>
<p>However, I know a version of Cayley's Theorem in which $n^{n-2}$ is the number of marked trees spanning $K_{n}$.</p>
<p>What I need is to show that the number of marked trees spanning $K_{n}$ is equal to the number of rooted trees with directed edges of order $n$. This way, the proof given above will be valid for the version I know of the theorem.</p>
<p>As I understand, rooted trees and rooted trees with directed edges are the same thing. It shouldn't be hard to prove anyway. The rest, I don't know.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/75878/cayleys-theorem-regarding-marked-trees/75882#75882Answer by Aaron Meyerowitz for Cayley's Theorem regarding marked treesAaron Meyerowitz2011-09-19T19:22:44Z2011-09-19T19:22:44Z<p>What is the question? This proof is in "Proofs from the Book" and credited to Jim Pitman.</p>