Sheaf with free stalks - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-19T12:08:05Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/75150http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/75150/sheaf-with-free-stalksSheaf with free stalksmaxim2011-09-11T16:52:26Z2011-09-12T15:19:34Z
<p>Say we are given a complex manifold $X$ and an $\mathcal{O}_X$-module $\mathcal{F}$. Assume that for any point $P\in X$ the stalk $\mathcal{F}_P$ is a free $(\mathcal{O}_X)_P$-module of finite rank. Does it imply that $\mathcal{F}$ is locally free? If not, what do you need to know additionally about $\mathcal{F}$ to make it true?</p>
<p>Note that if we were looking at the case of schemes then it would be wrong in general. Mathoverflow answer to a related question is
<a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/44839/wikipedias-definition-of-locally-free-sheaf" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
<p><strong>Remark:</strong> As it was pointed out by Francesco Polizzi, this is true if $\mathcal{F}$ is coherent. What if we do not know it apriori?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/75150/sheaf-with-free-stalks/75152#75152Answer by Francesco Polizzi for Sheaf with free stalksFrancesco Polizzi2011-09-11T17:24:14Z2011-09-11T17:24:14Z<p>The answer is <strong>yes,</strong> at least when $\mathcal{F}$ is a <em>coherent</em> sheaf.</p>
<p>This actually holds for any complex space. See [Grauert-Remmert, Coherent Analytic Sheaves, p. 90].</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/75150/sheaf-with-free-stalks/75161#75161Answer by Donu Arapura for Sheaf with free stalksDonu Arapura2011-09-11T21:38:12Z2011-09-12T15:19:34Z<p>Just looking at stalks is not enough:</p>
<p>Suppose that $X$ is a nontrivial complex manifold. Let
$i_x:x\to X$ denote the inclusion, and set
$$\mathcal{F} =\bigoplus_{x\in X} i_{x*}\mathcal{O}_x$$
Notice that
it is naturally an $\mathcal{O}_X$-module with $\mathcal{F}_x\cong \mathcal{O}_x$,
and yet it is certainly not locally free.</p>
<p><hr>
<strong>Notes</strong>
Rather than editing, I'll keep the original form of my answer in tact and add a few footnotes.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Of course, this $\mathcal{F}$ is not coherent.</p></li>
<li><p>(Re: UG's first comment.) I probably should have included the proof that $\mathcal{F}_x\cong \mathcal{O}_x$. Here it is. The left is the direct limit
<code>$$\varinjlim\bigoplus_{y\in U} \mathcal{O}_y$$</code>
as $U$ shrinks to $x$. There is a projection $p$ to $\mathcal{O}_x$ which is surjective
since it has a section. Suppose that $f=\sum f_y$ lies in the kernel of $p$. Shrink $U$ to
avoid the support of $f$ (which excludes $x$). Then we see that the class of $f$
in the direct limit must be zero. (There is a reason I took the sum and not the product.)</p></li>
<li><p>(Re: Laurent's comment.) By $i_{x*}\mathcal{O}_x$, I meant the skyscraper sheaf associated to $\mathcal{O}_x$.</p></li>
</ol>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/75150/sheaf-with-free-stalks/75167#75167Answer by unknown (google) for Sheaf with free stalksunknown (google)2011-09-11T22:10:54Z2011-09-11T22:10:54Z<p>This is a small modification of Donu's answer.</p>
<p>Let $\mathcal F=(i_x)_\ast\mathcal O_x$ (the skyscraper sheaf of $\mathcal O_x$ over $x$) for some $x\in X$. Then $\mathcal F$ is locally free of rank $1$ at $x$, and is locally free of rank $0$ everywhere else. Clearly $\mathcal F$ is not locally free near $x$, since it doesn't even have locally constant rank.</p>