The "pullback presheaf" and the proper base change theorem in topology - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-26T05:48:37Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/73171http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/73171/the-pullback-presheaf-and-the-proper-base-change-theorem-in-topologyThe "pullback presheaf" and the proper base change theorem in topologyHugo Chapdelaine2011-08-18T18:07:28Z2011-08-22T17:39:17Z
<p>Let $f:X\rightarrow Y$ be a continuous map of topological spaces and let $\mathcal{F}$
be a sheaf (say of abelian groups to fix the idea) on $Y$. Define the following rule on open sets of $X$:
$$
V\mapsto f'\mathcal{F}(V):=\varinjlim_{U\supseteq f(V)}\mathcal{F}(U)
$$
One may check that $f'\mathcal{F}$ gives a presheaf on $X$. Under some strong assumptions one may show that $f'\mathcal{F}$ is a sheaf on $X$. Let me give two examples</p>
<ol>
<li><p>If $Y$ is Hausdorff, locally compact and paracompact and $f$ is a closed embedding then $f'\mathcal{F}$ is actually a sheaf (this is not a trivial exercise, it took me a while to figure that out).</p></li>
<li><p>A variation of 1. is: if $Y$ is Hausdorff and locally compact,
and $f$ is the embedding of a compact subset $Y\subseteq X$. </p></li>
</ol>
<p>I got interested in this question since it is directly related to the proper base change
theorem in topology which says the following:</p>
<p><strong>Proper base change theorem</strong>: Let $f:X\rightarrow Y$ be a proper map with
$Y$ Hausdorff and locally compact and $X$ paracompact. Then for any sheaf
$\mathcal{F}$ on $Y$ and $y\in Y$ one has that
\begin{align}\label{eqn}
R^qf_*(\mathcal{F})_y\simeq H^q(X_y, f|_{X_y}^{-1}\mathcal{F}) \hspace{2cm} (\star)
\end{align}
where $X_y=f^{-1}(y)$ is the fiber above $y$.</p>
<p>So here are 3 questions:</p>
<p><strong>Q 1</strong> Is there a common generalization of 1. and 2. in the topological setting ?</p>
<p><strong>Q 2</strong> I would like to have a couple of (non-artificial ) examples where the presheaf $f'\mathcal{F}$ fails to be a sheaf in order to have a feeling for the possible geometrical (and/or topological) obstructions. (Note that this is closely related to examples of maps
where the isomorphism $(\star)$ above fail).</p>
<p><strong>Q 3</strong> To what extend is it possible to generalize the proper base change theorem
in the topological setting? (so here I have in mind of relaxing the assumptions on $f$
and may be adding additional restrictions on $Y$)</p>