Proofs of Mordell-Weil theorem - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-22T12:17:00Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/72288http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/72288/proofs-of-mordell-weil-theoremProofs of Mordell-Weil theoremaglearner2011-08-07T15:08:52Z2012-10-29T18:55:19Z
<p>I would like to ask if there exist pedagogical expositions of the Mordell-Weil theorem (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mordell%E2%80%93Weil_theorem" rel="nofollow">wikipedia</a>). What parts of number theory (algebraic geometry) one should better learn first before starting to read a proof of Mordell-Weil? </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/72288/proofs-of-mordell-weil-theorem/72292#72292Answer by Igor Rivin for Proofs of Mordell-Weil theoremIgor Rivin2011-08-07T15:21:35Z2011-08-07T15:21:35Z<p>Actually, the wikipedia article you cite cites Joe Silverman's book, which contains such a "pedagogical" exposition. The book is not entirely self-contained, but I am sure the preface explains the prerequisites.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/72288/proofs-of-mordell-weil-theorem/72294#72294Answer by Anar Akhmedov for Proofs of Mordell-Weil theoremAnar Akhmedov2011-08-07T16:02:37Z2011-08-07T16:02:37Z<p>J. Silverman and J. Tate "The rational points on elliptic curves" is a wonderful introduction to elliptic curves over rational numbers. It covers topics such as Mordell-Weil, Nagell-Lutz Theorem, elliptic curves over finite fields, etc.</p>
<p>For more advanced treatment of Mordell-Weil, I suggest the following textbook:</p>
<p>J. Silverman "The arithmetic of elliptic curves" (Chapter 8 is about Mordell-Weil).</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/72288/proofs-of-mordell-weil-theorem/72295#72295Answer by Denis Chaperon de Lauzières for Proofs of Mordell-Weil theoremDenis Chaperon de Lauzières2011-08-07T16:15:03Z2011-08-07T16:15:03Z<p>There is a very elementary and self-contained (modulo a few things proved earlier in the book) proof in Chapter 19 of the book of Ireland and Rosen, "A classical introduction to modern number theory". One might object that it can be misleading to use explicit but obscure polynomial identities instead of more intrinsic facts from algebraic geometry, but the text has lots of good remarks and references to go beyond this elementary approach.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/72288/proofs-of-mordell-weil-theorem/72301#72301Answer by Niels for Proofs of Mordell-Weil theoremNiels2011-08-07T19:38:32Z2011-08-07T19:38:32Z<p>I think one should also mention</p>
<p>Jean Pierre Serre</p>
<p>Lectures on the Mordell-Weil Theorem </p>
<p>Aspects of Mathematics</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/72288/proofs-of-mordell-weil-theorem/72302#72302Answer by Yuri Zarhin for Proofs of Mordell-Weil theoremYuri Zarhin2011-08-07T20:01:20Z2011-08-07T20:01:20Z<p>Manin's proof of Mordell-Weil theorem (for abelian varieties over number fields) has appeared as an appendix to Russian translation of First edition of Mumford's ``Abelian varieties". Eventually it was translated into English and published as an appendix to Second and Third editions of Mumford's book.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/72288/proofs-of-mordell-weil-theorem/72332#72332Answer by ACL for Proofs of Mordell-Weil theoremACL2011-08-08T06:38:40Z2012-10-29T18:55:19Z<p>For the case of elliptic curves, there is Mordell's proof, discussed in his book <em>Diophantine Equations</em> (pp. 138-148). I could hardly imagine less prerequisites than this.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/72288/proofs-of-mordell-weil-theorem/72333#72333Answer by Chandan Singh Dalawat for Proofs of Mordell-Weil theoremChandan Singh Dalawat2011-08-08T07:05:22Z2011-08-09T04:41:13Z<p>There must be a proof in Cassels' <em>Lectures on elliptic curves</em> (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991).</p>
<p>Se also his <a href="http://jlms.oxfordjournals.org/content/s1-41/1/193.full.pdf" rel="nofollow">masterly survey</a> <em>Diophantine equations with special reference to elliptic curves</em> (J. London Math. Soc. <strong>41</strong> (1966) 193–291) and the <a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=2092256&jid=PSP&volumeId=100&issueId=01&aid=2092248&bodyId=&membershipNumber=&societyETOCSession=" rel="nofollow">historical essay</a> <em>Mordell's finite basis theorem revisited</em> (Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. <strong>100</strong> (1986), no. 1, 31–41).</p>
<p>Here is a quote from this last paper :</p>
<p><em>Weil's generalization of Mordell's theorem (and subsequent generalizations) was usually referred to as the Mordell-Weil Theorem. Mordell himself strongly
disapproved of this usage and frequently insisted (in public and in private) that what
he had proved should be called Mordell's Theorem and that everything else could, for
his part, be called simply Weil's Theorem.</em></p>
<p><strong>Addendum</strong>. Another excellent source is Knapp's <em>Elliptic curves</em>
(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1992) which contains a proof of Mordell's theorem (over $\mathbf Q$).</p>
<p>There is a very affordable book by Milne (<em>Elliptic curves</em>, BookSurge Publishers, Charleston, 2006) and a very motivating one by Koblitz (<em>Introduction to elliptic curves and modular forms</em>, Springer, New York, 1993). Tate's Haverford Lectures also served as the basis for Husemoller (<em>Elliptic curves</em>, Springer, New York, 2004). </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/72288/proofs-of-mordell-weil-theorem/72349#72349Answer by Álvaro Lozano-Robledo for Proofs of Mordell-Weil theoremÁlvaro Lozano-Robledo2011-08-08T12:43:06Z2011-08-08T12:43:06Z<p>Already mentioned: Silverman and Tate's "Rational Points on Elliptic Curves" (undergraduate level) and Silverman's "The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves" (graduate level).</p>
<p>Another text at the undergraduate level that covers Mordell's theorem (i.e., the Mordell-Weil theorem for elliptic curves over $\mathbb{Q}$) is Washington's "Elliptic Curves: Number Theory and Cryptography" (see Chapter 8).</p>
<p>If you are looking for a proof of the Mordell-Weil theorem in its utmost generality (i.e., for abelian varieties over number fields), I would suggest Hindry and Silverman's "Diophantine Geometry: An Introduction" (see Part C).</p>