mnev's universality corollaries, quantitative versions? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-22T21:47:01Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/72154 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/72154/mnevs-universality-corollaries-quantitative-versions mnev's universality corollaries, quantitative versions? Alfredo Hubard 2011-08-05T07:18:59Z 2012-02-15T14:24:38Z <p>Mnev's universality theorem claims that any semialgebraic set is the realization space of some oriented matroid. Moreover, the rank of the or matroid can be prescribed in advance.</p> <p>1.-Are there interesting corollaries to Mnev's theorem? I am aware of interesting algorithmic consequences.</p> <p>Geometric consequences? Examples in which the theorem is used to prove that other moduli spaces can also be wild?</p> <p>MacPherson's definition of "combinatorial differentiable manifolds" and oriented matroid bundles are based on a local system of oriented matroids over a simplicial complex. Is there some implication from Mnev's theorem to the theory of combinatorial differentiable manifolds.</p> <p>What about proofs that would be easy (or statemens that would be true) if realization spaces of oriented matroids where better behaved, say connected, or contractible.. </p> <p>2.-Are there quantitative versions of this theorem relating (say) the number and degrees of the defining polynomial (in)equalities or the betty numbers of the semialgebraic set with the rank and number of elements in the corresponding or-mat. </p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/72154/mnevs-universality-corollaries-quantitative-versions/72156#72156 Answer by Dan Petersen for mnev's universality corollaries, quantitative versions? Dan Petersen 2011-08-05T07:51:29Z 2012-02-15T14:24:38Z <p>For your first question, you might be interested in Ravi Vakil's paper "Murphy's law in algebraic geometry". He uses Mnëv's theorem to show that a large family of moduli spaces which are known to have singularities are in fact "as singular as possible", by which he means that every possible type of singularity defined over $\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{Z})$ will appear at some point of the moduli space. </p> <p>Here's a different application. Kontsevich defined for every graph $G$ a hypersurface $Y_G$ in a way motivated by QFT and the theory of Feynmann integrals. Motivated by computer experiments, he suggested that period integrals on the $Y_G$ should always be multiple zeta values. I am not sure of the precise relationship here, but I believe that this is (at least morally) the same thing as stating that the cohomology of $Y_G$ contains only mixed Tate motives. This is a very strong condition to impose and would say that the cohomology of $Y_G$ is extremely special. In particular this would imply that the function <code>$q \mapsto \#Y_G(\mathbf F_q)$</code> that counts the number of points on $Y_G$ over a finite field is always given by a polynomial in $q$. Belkale and Brosnan in "Matroids, motives and a conjecture of Kontsevich" disproved this conjecture in the strongest possible way: they showed that for ANY scheme $X$ of finite type over $\mathbf Z$, the function <code>$q \mapsto \#Z(\mathbf F_q)$</code> is a finite linear combination of functions <code>$q \mapsto \#Y_G(\mathbf F_q)$</code> for graphs $G$. Their proof uses Mnëv's theorem in a crucial way. </p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/72154/mnevs-universality-corollaries-quantitative-versions/73732#73732 Answer by Nikolai Mnev for mnev's universality corollaries, quantitative versions? Nikolai Mnev 2011-08-26T05:25:54Z 2011-08-26T05:25:54Z <p>Here are some references <a href="http://www.pdmi.ras.ru/~mnev/bhu.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pdmi.ras.ru/~mnev/bhu.html</a> </p>