Fractal questions: Weierstraß-Mandelbrot - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T05:29:00Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/70209http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/70209/fractal-questions-weierstrass-mandelbrotFractal questions: Weierstraß-MandelbrotJose Capco2011-07-13T10:29:41Z2011-07-14T14:47:38Z
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Coming from a specific field in algebraic geometry I am a total noob in Fractal Theory and I'd like to learn it a bit. I hope I am tolerated for my maybe-trivial questions. I just read about the Weierstrass-Mandelbrot fractal (it's also simply called Weierstrass fractal using the Weierstrass function.. but there are dozens of Weierstrass functions so I'd rather call it "Weierstrass-Mandelbrot" function). The definition of this fractal is found in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weierstrass_function" rel="nofollow">wikipedia</a>. I got easily impressed by it.</p>
<p>My question is whether there are nowhere differentiable continuous functions (between real numbers) whose graph are not fractals? Is the WM function the easiest example of a nowhere differentialbe continuous function? </p>
<p>The other question is quite basic (for experts probably). I have seen the definition of fractal in wikipedia. This definition uses self-similarity. But in a reference of mine (from a lecture note) I get a definition that makes use of an inequality with Hausdorff-dimension and inductive dimension. Are these definitions equivalent or are the precise definition still under debate (my reference suggests that the suggested definition was former definition by Mandelbrot and then this definition was changed as Mandelbrot fractals don't follow this definition). A little enlightening would help :)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/70209/fractal-questions-weierstrass-mandelbrot/70214#70214Answer by BSteinhurst for Fractal questions: Weierstraß-MandelbrotBSteinhurst2011-07-13T11:31:01Z2011-07-13T11:31:01Z<p>A quick, partial answer to your second question about the definition of fractals. If a fractal is generated by an iterated function system with a scaling ratio less than one then you do get a Hausdorff dimension less than the inductive dimension. However it is not particularly difficult to create a set with Hausdorff dimension less than inductive dimension that should be a fractal that isn't self-similar. The idea is to choose between two iterated function systems aperiodically. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/70209/fractal-questions-weierstrass-mandelbrot/70229#70229Answer by Gerald Edgar for Fractal questions: Weierstraß-MandelbrotGerald Edgar2011-07-13T14:51:18Z2011-07-14T14:47:38Z<p><strong>My question is whether there are nowhere differentiable continuous functions (between real numbers) whose graph are not fractals?</strong><br>
Of course this depends on your definition of <em>fractal</em>. There are nowhere-differentiable functions with graph of Hausdorff dimension 1.</p>
<p><strong>Is the WM function the easiest example of a nowhere differentialbe continuous function?</strong><br>
No.<br>
For example, a nowhere-differentiable function due to Kießwetter was designed to be used with high-school students in Germany. English translation in my book: <em>Classics on Fractals</em> </p>
<p><strong>Are these definitions equivalent</strong><br>
No, the definition with self-similarity is not equivalent to Hausdorff dimension > topological dimension. [Using self-similarity as a <em>definition</em> of fractal should be considered something to use for non-mathematicians who are curious about the subject, but have no hope to understand measures and such for the real definition.]</p>
<p><strong>are the precise definition still under debate</strong><br>
Mandelbrot gave the definition: Hausdorff dimension strictly greater than topological dimension. He later wrote that he regretted this, and instead it should be left undefined. Others have provided other definitions. For actual mathematical papers, the authors of course state what they are proving in real mathematical language, not using the word <em>fractal</em> or just using it for the vague explanatory part of the paper.</p>
<hr>
<p><strong>added</strong><br>
Kiesswetter function, two figures from <em>Classics on Fractals</em> </p>
<p><img src="http://i51.tinypic.com/149uutw.jpg" alt="Figure 18.2"> </p>
<p><img src="http://i51.tinypic.com/2iqbofm.jpg" alt="Figure 18.3"> </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/70209/fractal-questions-weierstrass-mandelbrot/70232#70232Answer by Per Alexandersson for Fractal questions: Weierstraß-MandelbrotPer Alexandersson2011-07-13T15:12:51Z2011-07-13T15:12:51Z<p>You can also create a continuous, non-differentiable function by restricting the height map produced by the midpoint displacement algorithm to a line:
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond-square_algorithm" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond-square_algorithm</a></p>
<p>This will not be self-similar, each open segment will with probability 1 be unique (if I am not mistaken). The displacement factor can be tuned so that the fractal dimension is any number between 1 and 2.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/70209/fractal-questions-weierstrass-mandelbrot/70244#70244Answer by André Henriques for Fractal questions: Weierstraß-MandelbrotAndré Henriques2011-07-13T16:48:14Z2011-07-13T16:48:14Z<p>The question <i>"are nowhere differentiable continuous functions (between real numbers) whose graph are not fractals?"</i> has no answer, because there is no universally accepted definition of fractal:</p>
<p><a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/56677#56779" rel="nofollow">http://mathoverflow.net/questions/56677#56779</a>
<br><br>
But I'd say yes : Every nowhere differentiable C⁰ function has some <i>"fractalness"</i>.</p>