$Hilb_{lines}^{x}(X)$ and $Hilb_{lines}^{x}(X_{red})$ - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T04:52:08Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/69360http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/69360/hilb-linesxx-and-hilb-linesxx-red$Hilb_{lines}^{x}(X)$ and $Hilb_{lines}^{x}(X_{red})$gio2011-07-02T19:58:13Z2011-07-02T22:38:47Z
<p>Let $X$ be a irreducible closed subscheme of $\mathbb{P}^N_{\mathbb{C}}$,
and $U$ is a nonempty open where $X$ is smooth and moreover for every $x\in U$ and for every line $l\subseteq X$ with $x\in l$ assume $l \subseteq X\setminus \mathrm{sing}(X)$.
If $x\in U$, clearly
$$
Hilb_{lines}^{x}(X)=Hilb_{lines}^{x}(X_{red})
$$
as the identity of sets, but is it true as identity of schemes?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/69360/hilb-linesxx-and-hilb-linesxx-red/69368#69368Answer by Jack Huizenga for $Hilb_{lines}^{x}(X)$ and $Hilb_{lines}^{x}(X_{red})$Jack Huizenga2011-07-02T22:38:47Z2011-07-02T22:38:47Z<p>If you let $V = X \setminus \mathrm{sing}(X)$, then assuming $x\in U$ we see that the Hilbert scheme of lines in $X$ passing through $x$ is the same as the Hilbert scheme of lines in $V$ passing through $x$. Indeed, the flat families of lines through $x$ in $X$ are exactly the same as the flat families of lines through $x$ in $V$, so the representing schemes are the same as well (if somebody has a better way of saying this please comment!). Furthermore, $V$ is reduced, so this is also the same as the Hilbert scheme of lines in $X_{\mathrm{red}}$ passing through $x$.</p>