Complexes of representations with complementary central charges - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-25T15:28:58Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/6923 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/6923/complexes-of-representations-with-complementary-central-charges Complexes of representations with complementary central charges Leonid Positselski 2009-11-27T00:40:17Z 2009-11-30T16:42:53Z <p>This is another question asking for references. There is an important phenomenon of correspondence between (complexes of) representations of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras with the complementary central charges. This applies to infinite-dimensional Lie algebras of a certain kind, like the Virasoro or Kac-Moody algebras.</p> <p>Let me describe the Virasoro case. Consider representations on which the central element of Virasoro acts by a constant c, and also representations on which it acts by the constant 26-c. Additional conditions have to be imposed on the representations, namely, that the positive-graded part of Virasoro acts nilpotently, or some variation of this. Then there is a way to assign (contravariantly) complexes of representations with the central charge 26-c to complexes of representations with the central charge c.</p> <p>The Kac-Moody case is similar, except that there is another number (depending on the Kac-Moody algebra) in place of 26. (Actually, this holds for any Lie algebra graded by the integers with finite-dimensional components, and it can be generalized even further.)</p> <p>This correspondence functor was not very well defined, classically, because it sometimes assigns acyclic complexes to nonacyclic ones and vice versa. I know how to make it well-defined, and even a (covariant) equivalence of triangulated categories. This is exactly the reason why I am asking for references to any classical expositions where the problem of constructing such a functor or equivalence were, at least, raised. I myself learned about this problem from folklore.</p> <p>The only references I am presently aware of are some papers by Feigin--Fuchs and <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01214971" rel="nofollow">Rocha-Caridi--Wallach</a> circa 1984 where the Verma and irreducible modules over the Virasoro algebra were studied. The discussion there is very brief; the very fact that one sometimes obtains acyclic complexes as duals to irreducible modules is never mentioned explicitly. Are there any later and/or more detailed references?</p> <p>EDIT: Let me add some details about the construction. Feigin and Fuchs explain <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01078118" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BFb0099939" rel="nofollow">here</a> that the categories of Verma modules over the Virasoro with central charges c and 26-c are anti-equivalent. The next natural step would be extending this anti-equivalence to non-Verma modules by a kind of derived functor construction, using Verma modules as adjusted objects. So one takes the trivial one-dimensional module at c=0, writes its left resolution made of Verma modules, and applies the Feigin-Fuchs anti-equivalence to this complex of Verma modules. What one obtains is a complex of Verma modules at c=26, bounded from below but not from above. This complex turns out to be acyclic.</p> <p>Thus if one wishes to make this an equivalence of derived categories, one has to explain in what sense can an acyclic complex be a nontrivial object and what kind of derived category this is. My question is whether this predicament have been described anywhere in the literature (before my own <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.3398" rel="nofollow">monograph</a> have presumably resolved it, among other things).</p>