reference for Noether's theorem - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-21T10:42:38Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/69055 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/69055/reference-for-noethers-theorem reference for Noether's theorem user4 2011-06-28T21:21:56Z 2012-05-21T09:20:43Z <p>What is a good reference for a geometric version of Noether's theorem about Lagrangians, symmetries and conserved currents?</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/69055/reference-for-noethers-theorem/69063#69063 Answer by Javier Álvarez for reference for Noether's theorem Javier Álvarez 2011-06-28T22:36:59Z 2011-06-30T07:16:22Z <p>There are not too many books that do a proper job regarding Noether's theorem. Some books which are standard references for a differential geometric treatment of theoretical (classical) mechanics, and which deal with it in that language are:</p> <ul> <li><p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=4Y-ownk6ilsC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=marsden,+foundations+mechanics&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=-lIKTpvIFsbX8gO25aGGAQ&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA" rel="nofollow"><strong>Marsden / Abraham</strong> - "<em>Foundations of Mechanics</em>"</a></p></li> <li><p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=I2gH9ZIs-3AC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=Marsden,+Introduction+to+Mechanics&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=5CEMTv-YI5HBswb7msXbDg&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA" rel="nofollow"><strong>Marsden</strong> - "<em>Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry</em>"</a></p></li> <li><p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=Pd8-s6rOt_cC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=arnold,+mechanics&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=MlMKTsbiJMiv8gPkj9SGAQ&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;sqi=2&amp;ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA" rel="nofollow"><strong>Arnold</strong> - "<em>Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics</em>"</a></p></li> <li><p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=Eql9dRQDgvQC&amp;pg=PA1&amp;dq=jose,+mechanics&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=mVMKTtHSKs6v8QPA5fShAQ&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA" rel="nofollow"><strong>José / Saletán</strong> - "<em>Classical Dynamics, A Contemporary Approach</em>"</a></p></li> <li><p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Geometry-Applications-Transformation-Mathematics/dp/0387976639/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_c" rel="nofollow"><strong>Dubrovin / Fomenko / Novikov</strong> - "<em>Modern Geometry. Part I: Geometry of Surfaces, Transformation Groups and Fields</em>"</a> (as recommended in a previoius comment by Giuseppe)</p></li> <li><p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=5pCfP8CiSzAC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=Methods_of_Differential_Geometry_in_Analytical_Mechanics&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=yBwMTqzYFIz1sgax1u2TDw&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=book-preview-link&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CC0QuwUwAA#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false" rel="nofollow"><strong>de León / Rodrigues</strong> - <em>"Methods of Differential Geometry in Analytical Mechanics</em>"</a></p></li> </ul> <p>As a theoretical physicist who wanted to study these things in the most mathematical way possible, I found those books extremely helpful to bridge the gap between the two settings. For the history of such an important result, this recent book is very interesting:</p> <ul> <li><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=e8F38Pu0YgEC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=Kosmann-Schwarzbach+-+The+Noether+Theorems&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=UFYKTpf2F8Sn8QPg0uCdAQ&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA" rel="nofollow">Kosmann-Schwarzbach - "<em>The Noether Theorems</em>"</a></li> </ul> <p>You may also be interested in the style of mathematical mechanics articles and books developed by:</p> <ul> <li><p><a href="http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0302027v1" rel="nofollow"><strong>Sardanashvily</strong> - <em>Noether conservation laws in Classical Mechanics</em>"</a></p></li> <li><p><a href="http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0908.1886v2" rel="nofollow"><strong>Sardanashvily</strong> - "<em>Fibre Bundles, Jet Manifolds and Lagrangian Theory. Lectures for Theoreticians"</em></a></p></li> <li><p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=-N6F44hlnhgC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=Mangiarotti,+Gauge+Mechanics&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=91YKTurLFcmX8QPk0-ht&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA" rel="nofollow"><strong>Mangiarotti / Sardanashvili</strong> - "<em>Gauge Mechanics</em>"</a></p></li> <li><p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=yY3NEoMWIDUC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=Connections+in+Classical+and+Quantum+Field+Theory&amp;hl=en&amp;src=bmrr&amp;ei=FiEMTqToL9HItAaz5aDMDg&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false" rel="nofollow"><strong>Mangiarotti / Sardanashvili</strong> - "<em>Connections in Classical and Quantum Field Theory</em>"</a></p></li> <li><p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=2X7xYjRwS8QC&amp;printsec=frontcover" rel="nofollow"><strong>Giachetta / Mangiarotti / Sardanashvili</strong> - "<em>Advanced Classical Field Theory</em>"</a></p></li> <li><p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Geometric-Formulation-Classical-Quantum-Mechanics/dp/9814313726/ref=sr_1_53?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1309412589&amp;sr=1-53" rel="nofollow"><strong>Giachetta / Mangiarotti / Sardanashvili</strong> - "<em>Geometric Formulation of Classical and Quantum Mechanics</em>"</a></p></li> <li><p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=sZQx5Xrz4vIC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=New+Lagrangian+and+Hamiltonian+Methods+in+Field+Theory&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=qSAMTueJA8zLswariZXSDg&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false" rel="nofollow"><strong>Giachetta / Mangiarotti / Sardanashvili</strong> - "<em>New Lagrangian and Hamiltonian methods in field theory</em>"</a></p></li> </ul> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/69055/reference-for-noethers-theorem/69066#69066 Answer by Willie Wong for reference for Noether's theorem Willie Wong 2011-06-28T23:01:24Z 2011-06-28T23:01:24Z <p>Javier already gave some very good references. Let me just add one more if you are thinking about classical field theories: Demetrios Christodoulou, <em>Action Principle and Partial Differential Equations</em>.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/69055/reference-for-noethers-theorem/69072#69072 Answer by Spiro Karigiannis for reference for Noether's theorem Spiro Karigiannis 2011-06-29T00:23:38Z 2011-06-29T00:23:38Z <p>Another excellent book that does a proper job with Noether's Theorem is Peter Olver's <A HREF="http://books.google.com/books/about/Applications_of_Lie_groups_to_differenti.html?id=sI2bAxgLMXYC" rel="nofollow">Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations</A>.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/69055/reference-for-noethers-theorem/69102#69102 Answer by Michael for reference for Noether's theorem Michael 2011-06-29T08:47:12Z 2011-06-29T08:47:12Z <p>A fairly modern approach which is usually attributed to Vinogradov (see also the last part of Kosmann-Schwarzbachs "Noether Theorems") can be found in the book <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=tJSobeeSYHQC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;pg=PP1#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false" rel="nofollow">Symmetries and Conservation Laws for Differential Equations in Mathematical Physics</a>. The chapter on conservation laws and the Noether theorem is somewhat dense and requires a little familiarity with homological algebra and spectral sequences. So it might be good to complement it with another book (like Olvers). </p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/69055/reference-for-noethers-theorem/97037#97037 Answer by Jose Navarro for reference for Noether's theorem Jose Navarro 2012-05-15T19:37:40Z 2012-05-21T09:20:43Z <p>The simplest, most elegant and strongest version I know is, by far, the one in Aderson's <a href="http://math.uni.lu/~michel/data/VARIATIONNAL%20BICOMPLEX.pdf" rel="nofollow">book</a> (see page 106 and ss.) He deals directly with the variational equation, with no explicit mention to the lagrangian.</p> <p>(By the way, it is surprising why this statement is not mentioned in Schwarzbachs' book!)</p>