What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-22T11:28:02Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/68442 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? gowers 2011-06-21T22:05:43Z 2011-10-31T12:48:14Z <p>This is a soft question but it's not meant as a big-list question. I have recently been asked whether I want to provide feedback at the pre-beta stage on a forthcoming website that will provide a platform for data sharing, and rather than giving just my personal opinion I'd rather consult other mathematicians first. I was going to write a blog post but then I thought that Mathoverflow was a more suitable place since I have a question and I'm looking for answers of a certain type rather than general comments. The website seems to be aimed mostly at scientists who want to share raw data, so at first I thought it probably wouldn't be much use to mathematicians since our data is (or are if you prefer) mostly highly interlinked -- the connections are often more interesting than what they connect. </p> <p>But on further reflection, it seems to me that a good data sharing site could be a valuable resource, even if it doesn't do absolutely everything any mathematician would ever want. For instance, Sloane's database is fantastically useful. A rather different sort of database that is also useful is Scott Aaronson's Complexity Zoo. So useful databases exist already. Is this an aspect of mathematical life that could be greatly expanded given the right platform? And if so, what should the platform be like?</p> <p>I don't know anything about the design of the site, but if I'm going to comment intelligently on what features it would need to have to be useful to mathematicians, I'd like to be armed with some examples of the kind of data sharing we might actually go in for. Here are a few ideas off the top of my head. </p> <ol> <li><p>Diophantine equations: one could have a list of what is known about various different ones.</p></li> <li><p>Mathematical problems: listed in some nice categorized way, each problem accompanied by a description, complete with reading list, of what you really ought to know before thinking about the problem. (As an example, if you are thinking about the P versus NP problem, then you really ought to know about the Razborov/Rudich natural proofs paper.)</p></li> <li><p>Key examples in various different areas and subareas of mathematics.</p></li> <li><p>Sometimes you have a whole lot of related mathematical properties with a complicated pattern of implications between them. Under such circumstances, it could be nice to have this information presented in a nice graphical way (something I think this site may be able to do well -- they seem to be keen on visualization) with links to proofs of the implications or counterexamples that demonstrate when the implications do not hold. (The example I'm thinking of while writing this is different forms of the approximation property for Banach spaces, but there are presumably several others.)</p></li> <li><p>List of special functions and the facts about each one that are the main facts one uses to prove things about them.</p></li> <li><p>List of integrals that can be evaluated, with descriptions of how they can be evaluated.</p></li> <li><p>List of important irrational numbers with their decimal expansions to vast numbers of places. (I'm not sure why this would be useful but it might be amusing.)</p></li> </ol> <p>These are supposed to be examples where people could usefully pool the background knowledge that they pick up while doing research. I'm not particularly pleased with them: they should be thought of as a challenge to come up with better ones, which almost certainly exist. If you've ever thought, "Wouldn't it be nice if there's somewhere where I could look up X," then X would make a great answer. I think the most interesting answers would be research-level answers (unlike some of the suggestions above).</p> <p>If there were a site with a lot of databases, it would make a great place to browse: it would be much easier to find useful data there than if it was scattered all round the internet.</p> <p>One constraint on answers: there should be something about a suggested database that makes it unsuitable for Wikipedia, since otherwise putting it on Wikipedia would appear to be more sensible.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68443#68443 Answer by Mariano Suárez-Alvarez for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2011-06-21T22:16:10Z 2011-06-21T22:16:10Z <p>I' d love to have a database of various combinatorial structures. </p> <p>For example, a while ago Greg Kuperberg found for me the small ones <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/25259/" rel="nofollow">here</a>, and I joyfully have in my possesion 9 DVDs (around 40 gigabytes, in a very efficient special purpose format) containing the 11,084,874,829 triple systems on 19 points as found by [P. Kaski and P. R. J. Östergård, The Steiner triple system of order 19, Math. Comp. 73 (2004), 2075–2092.] </p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68446#68446 Answer by André Henriques for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? André Henriques 2011-06-21T22:30:54Z 2011-06-21T22:40:53Z <p>It would be really useful to have a database containing various computations of (co)homology/homotopy groups of various spaces that arise in algebraic topology...<br> <i>Note:</i> There is so much known out there that one would have to first think <i>really hard</i> about how to organize it all.</p> <p>Here's an example:<br> I could imagine that, for certain users, listing the first 30 integral cohomology groups of the spaces $K(\mathbb Z,1)$, $K(\mathbb Z,2)$, $K(\mathbb Z,3)$, and $K(\mathbb Z,4)$ could be more useful¹ than listing <i>all</i> the cohomology groups of <i>all</i> the $K(\mathbb Z,n)$'s. The reason is that, in order to do the latter, the information has to be packaged in a certain way that might be hard to understand: the user would need to unpack that information before she can access it. <br><br> ¹ Of course, it's even better to have <i>both</i> pieces of information available.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68447#68447 Answer by Joel David Hamkins for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? Joel David Hamkins 2011-06-21T22:34:38Z 2011-06-21T22:53:22Z <p>There are several natural examples from set theory. </p> <ul> <li><p>Here is a database on <a href="http://consequences.emich.edu/file-source/htdocs/conseq.htm" rel="nofollow">consequences of and equivalent formulations of the axiom of choice</a>, which is searchable by keyword and axiom form, and which contains hundreds of formulations of choice-like axioms, while providing the implication relations between them and the known models that separate them. I have had occasion to use this database in my research, and the data is useful. I can easily imagine, however, a greatly improved interface or more visual manner of presenting the data, and perhaps this is the kind of situation you seek.</p></li> <li><p>It would be useful to have a nice visual database of the connections and possibilities between all the various <a href="http://www.math.lsa.umich.edu/~ablass/hbk.pdf" rel="nofollow">cardinal characteristics of the continuum</a>. Perhaps such a thing exists already...</p></li> <li><p>More generally, I can imagine some kind of database keeping track of the various independence results over ZFC (or other theories), especially when combinations of statements are considered, and the models that achieve them.</p></li> <li><p>I can imagine a database of the logical relations between various large ardinal notions and their strengths. The mere fact that the large cardinal chart in Kanamori's book The Higher Infinite is so often consulted proves that a much larger and more comprehensive version of that information would be useful. </p></li> </ul> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68448#68448 Answer by Gerhard Paseman for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? Gerhard Paseman 2011-06-21T22:51:59Z 2011-06-21T22:51:59Z <p>I would like a mathematical search-thesaurus; this would be a list of descriptions people thought of to use as search terms (and that I might think of using) and for each description, a list of phrases that appeared in documents which contained stuff relevant to the descriptions. A recent example might be: "gently falling curve" yields "roller coaster physics". A prototype of a thesaurus could be built out of the MathOverflow database.</p> <p>Gerhard "Searching For The Right Words" Paseman, 2011.06.21</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68450#68450 Answer by Vijay D for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? Vijay D 2011-06-21T23:05:58Z 2011-06-21T23:05:58Z <p>There are two databases I have wished for during my studies. </p> <p>One of notation for various mathematical concepts, covering cultural differences. For example the different ways to denote the open-closed interval, or that different symbols are used for strict subset. LaTeX symbols or macros when they exist, would also be useful. This would have greatly helped me when reading things for the first time and later with writing. Such material is definitely out of scope for Wikipedia. </p> <p>Another useful database would be of logics and logical theories. These could range from propositional logics to higher order and infinitary logics. The theories should include various fragments of arithmetic, algebraic theories, theories of strings, etc. For each, I would be interested in what is known about decidability (and computational complexity), completeness, interpolation, etc. Currently, I use the Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy and Wikipedia but what I want may often not be there or not succinctly presented for reference purposes.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68454#68454 Answer by Jesko Hüttenhain for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? Jesko Hüttenhain 2011-06-21T23:13:15Z 2011-06-21T23:13:15Z <p>The one thing that can really be a problem, particularly when you are not that familiar with some area, is when you become interested in objects of some kind with a particular property and you do not know that these are usually being referred to as, say, Garfield-Dilbert-FooBars. More generally speaking, sometimes you do not know the name of a mathematical definition and that name alone would help immensely. I for one would like to have a hierachical database where you can find such names. For instance, you search for "surface", "complete" and "regular" and (among maybe other things), it tells you what a K3 Surface is. There should be plenty more examples like this.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68456#68456 Answer by Helge for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? Helge 2011-06-21T23:33:03Z 2011-06-21T23:33:03Z <p>Falling under "Wouldn't it be nice if there's somewhere where I could look up X":</p> <p>Typos, mistakes, and expanded calculation for published papers. Of course, this is more or less wishful thinking since I have no idea how to deal with potential correctness issues, etc...</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68459#68459 Answer by robot for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? robot 2011-06-21T23:42:57Z 2011-06-21T23:42:57Z <p>Lie group theory and their representations certainly deserve a database. (See e.g. Atlas project and Olver's books that are the only reference for classification of smooth group actions on $\mathbb{R}^n$ for small $n$ that I am aware of.)</p> <p>Also there is a project to create an internet database of solutions to Einstein equations and I guess that other important PDE's could use a database too.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68461#68461 Answer by André Henriques for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? André Henriques 2011-06-21T23:58:19Z 2011-06-21T23:58:19Z <p>Having a list of <b>named theorems</b> along with their statements (and references) would be great.</p> <p>Here's by a "named theorem", I mean a theorem that is routinely quoted by experts in the field, without giving any reference or further explanation, such as "Noether's theorem".</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68467#68467 Answer by Timothy Chow for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? Timothy Chow 2011-06-22T01:13:04Z 2011-06-22T01:27:17Z <p>It seems to me that it would be a good start to list existing resources that are already known to be useful. These should be a good indication of what other resources would be useful, if not examples of resources that would benefit from being located in a single centralized place instead of scattered across the web. Here are three categories of resources that come to mind.</p> <ol> <li><p>Tables of data for small examples of various important families of mathematical objects. In addition to those that have already been listed, I'll mention <a href="http://www.warwick.ac.uk/~masgaj/ftp/data/" rel="nofollow">Cremona's elliptic curve data</a> and a list of data about small matroids on <a href="http://www.davidhaws.net/Matroids/" rel="nofollow">David Haws's site</a>.</p></li> <li><p>Code repositories for implementations of important algorithms that aren't readily available in a standard mathematical computation package. Currently these seem to be scattered across people's personal homepages, and run on a variety of computing environments, although <a href="http://sagemath.org/" rel="nofollow">Sage</a> is making a creditable attempt to unify everything.</p></li> <li><p>Dynamic surveys, such as those maintained by the <a href="http://www.combinatorics.org/Surveys/index.html" rel="nofollow">Electronic Journal of Combinatorics</a>. These are typically maintained by a single person, although some of them might benefit from wikification. The <a href="http://www.nada.kth.se/~viggo/problemlist/compendium.html" rel="nofollow">NP Optimization Compendium</a> might be an example of this; the subject is so vast that it is hard for just one or two people to keep it up to date.</p></li> </ol> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68469#68469 Answer by Joseph O'Rourke for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? Joseph O'Rourke 2011-06-22T01:52:34Z 2011-06-22T01:52:34Z <p>Here is a model to emulate: <a href="http://qwiki.stanford.edu/index.php/Complexity_Zoo" rel="nofollow">The Complexity Zoo</a>, and the associated <a href="http://qwiki.stanford.edu/index.php/Complexity_Garden" rel="nofollow">Complexity Garden</a>, already mentioned by Timothy. If you ever encounter an unknown (to-you) complexity class acronym (PPP, LOCCFL, QIP, ...), then this is the source to consult. Does this fail the Wikipedia test? You can look up each acronym individually, but to have the entire Zoo (I count[grep] 569 entries) in front of you as you try to identify features of the animals is extremely useful. And in fact most Wikipedia entries for the individual classes link to The Complexity Zoo for further information.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68475#68475 Answer by Nilima Nigam for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? Nilima Nigam 2011-06-22T03:42:39Z 2011-06-22T03:48:59Z <p>For numerical analysts and scientific computing folks, a database of 'standard problems' with given geometry, parameters, tolerances and input/output specifications, and a mechanism for storing and comparing (curated) computational attacks on these. For example, the problem of lid-driven cavity flow is considered a major test for computational fluid dynamics, and it would be great to have an agreed set of 3 or 4 sub-problems (laminar flows, angled walls, incompressible flows, nearly incompressible flow) on which the performance of algorithms could be compared. </p> <p>Comparisons of the performance of algorithms on a given problem according to criteria such as accuracy, storage needed, and efficiency would be useful. Code in a given language would be useful, but one probably cannot insist on this. </p> <p>There's a dearth of such 'standard problems', and thus algorithms purportedly approximating solutions for the same problem are rarely compared. NIST has an example of such standard problems for models of micromagnetics. <a href="http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/~rdm/mumag.org.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/~rdm/mumag.org.html</a></p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68478#68478 Answer by Bruce Westbury for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? Bruce Westbury 2011-06-22T03:56:13Z 2011-06-22T07:21:36Z <p>My feeling about this is closest to the answer by Timothy Chow. First somewhere I can look up a definition or a named theorem would be better off somewhere else. There are existing databases that have proved themselves useful. The OEIS is far more useful than I would ever have expected. John Cremona's database of elliptic curves is the result of a lifetime's hard work although I have not used it myself. Again it is not my field but my understanding is that GAP includes many databases that have been built up over years. There is also Thistlewaite's KnotScape and Bar Natan's KnotAtlas which are databases of knot tables and knot invariants. There is also Nauty which produces great lists of graphs and related stuctures.</p> <p>It seems to me that all of these become far more useful if the database is part of a computer algebra package. Furthermore that it is not just the data but the calculations that can be done with it that make it useful to mathematicians.</p> <p>My feeling is that 5. 6. 7. are covered already in computer algebra packages. </p> <p>Edit: Of course I left out the two databases that I use without thought. MathSciNet and the arXiv.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68482#68482 Answer by S. Sra for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? S. Sra 2011-06-22T04:18:24Z 2011-06-22T04:18:24Z <p>Sorry I couldn't resist mentioning the answers to your own question as a viable database:</p> <ol> <li><a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/23478/examples-of-common-false-beliefs-in-mathematics" rel="nofollow">http://mathoverflow.net/questions/23478/examples-of-common-false-beliefs-in-mathematics</a></li> </ol> <p>(Of course, before it becomes a typical database, it will require some organizing, categorizing, etc.)</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68489#68489 Answer by Per Alexandersson for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? Per Alexandersson 2011-06-22T08:29:05Z 2011-06-22T08:29:05Z <p>List of theorems, with tagged input/output. The way I see it, is that each lemma/theorem/proposition has some input (objects they state something about), and output (the actual result).</p> <p>For example, a simple theorem that states "A polynomial in one variable with non-negative coefficients do not have positive roots." could be tagged as</p> <p>Input: Polynomial P with properties non-neg coefficients Output: The non-existence of a positive root.</p> <p>I often find myself in situations where I have an object with certain properties, so a way of searching on theorems about objects with these properties would be very convenient. This could be expanded into a database where each theorem has a computer-verifiable proof.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68516#68516 Answer by David White for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? David White 2011-06-22T14:08:06Z 2011-06-29T23:23:32Z <p>I agree with André Henriques regarding algebraic topology. In addition to cohomology of $K(\mathbb{Z},n)$ data, I'd also like to see pages of spectral sequences computing various other things of interest, e.g. homotopy groups of spheres, complex cobordism, modules over real $K$-theory, etc. This subject has a massive dearth of examples, especially of examples using spectral sequences. One place where some computations exist is <a href="http://www.math.wayne.edu/~rrb/cohom/index.html" rel="nofollow">Bob Bruner's webpage</a>, and I like the way he displays some of those spectral sequences as JPEGs. I envision something like that going into this database, but with more computations because more mathematicians can contribute.</p> <p>In a related vein, I would LOVE to have a repository of applets and other computer code mathematicians have written to help them do computation. For instance, Aaron Mazel-Gee has an <a href="http://math.berkeley.edu/~aaron/adem/" rel="nofollow">Adem relation calculator</a> which would have helped me a ton back when I was starting to learn this material. I've found various other applets (e.g. from Christian Nassau's <a href="http://www.nullhomotopie.de/" rel="nofollow">webpage</a> linked from Bob Bruner's page) but it's not easy. If we had a database it seems it would be a natural place to put up code we've written along with documentation to help others with similar computations. Obviously algebraists have SAGE and GAP but there seems to be nothing like that for algebraic topology. If there is such a place please let me know, especially if it helps with the bookkeeping in spectral sequence computations!</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68518#68518 Answer by David White for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? David White 2011-06-22T14:14:18Z 2011-06-22T14:14:18Z <p>I feel this proposed database would need a link to the <a href="http://oeis.org/" rel="nofollow">Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences</a></p> <p>This seems to fit the bill as "the kind of data sharing we would go for," although it would be rather silly to duplicate the OEIS rather than simply linking to it.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68519#68519 Answer by David White for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? David White 2011-06-22T14:21:15Z 2011-06-22T14:21:15Z <p>I like that this is community wiki, so I can throw out a crazy idea and not feel bad if people vote it down. I've come across a number of questions on MO of the flavor "please give me a textbook recommendation for subject X." What about having a page in the database for mathematicians to rank textbooks in various fields, e.g. by voting for them. </p> <p>The obvious problem I foresee with this is that different textbooks are good for different levels of learning, but I suppose this page could be geared towards undergrads or early grad students who don't yet know which books will serve them best. By the time you are an expert in a field you don't need textbook recommendations, so this aspect of the database would need to be purely pedagogical and geared towards people starting in a subject. </p> <p>As it stands, I need to search several websites (e.g. Google books, Amazon, Goodreads, etc) for recommendations and these can come from literally anyone. With this database I assume we'd be restricting who can post to the database so that only professional mathematicians could. So I would know that I could trust the recommendations as coming from a mature and knowledgeable source rather than an undergrad who just got a bad grade and blames the textbook.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68520#68520 Answer by David White for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? David White 2011-06-22T14:31:16Z 2011-06-22T14:31:16Z <p>I would like such a database to include a list of conferences by field of study and location of the conference. As it stands several people have webpages where they post about conferences and there's also the <a href="http://www.ams.org/meetings/calendar/mathcal" rel="nofollow">AMS page</a> but some conferences still slip through and I don't hear about them till they're over. One would assume that a giant database which all professional mathematicians could contribute to would not have this problem. Conference organizers could post to this database and in this way get the word out to a much larger audience. It's also not at all hard (using say SQL) to make your database self-cleaning, i.e. remove conferences that have already happened.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/68522#68522 Answer by David White for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? David White 2011-06-22T15:06:34Z 2011-06-22T15:06:34Z <p>In the flavor of "Wouldn't it be nice if there's somewhere where I could look up X," I think the database could probably use a list of online lectures which are freely available, e.g. some entries given by <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/54430/video-lectures-of-mathematics-courses-available-online-for-free/" rel="nofollow">this</a> MO question.</p> <p>In the same vein, I could also imagine listing lecture notes people have prepared for courses, but this would be harder since there are so many places online where professors have posted their lecture notes and it can be difficult to say when one set of lecture notes is "better" than another. Still, having online lectures as well as <em>resources</em> for teaching (e.g. <a href="http://calculusapplets.com/" rel="nofollow">calculus applets</a>) would fit the bill of things I like to look up but often have to search all over the web for.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/69152#69152 Answer by Jacques Carette for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? Jacques Carette 2011-06-29T22:24:28Z 2011-06-29T22:24:28Z <p>Several times this week I wished I could find a list of adjunctions and the <em>explicit</em> monad and comonad thereby generated. May as well throw in the algebras thus generated, as well as the Kleisli and Eilenberg-Moore categories. The usefulness would come from having all the definitions <em>properly unwound</em>, so that one would recognize the 'familiar' objects immediately.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/74948#74948 Answer by Joseph O'Rourke for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? Joseph O'Rourke 2011-09-08T23:08:15Z 2011-09-08T23:08:15Z <p>It appears that none of us suggested exactly this in response to Timothy's call, but a group of authors from Germany, Denmark, and Australia have committed to make it happen: "<a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.1465" rel="nofollow">The <em>Open Graph Archive</em>: A Community-Driven Effort</a>."</p> <p>From their conclusion:</p> <blockquote> <p>We advocated the need for an open, worldwide graphbase to collect and distribute graphs and programs for their generation, analysis, manipulation, and drawing.</p> </blockquote> <p>And here is their <em>Abstract</em>:</p> <blockquote> <p>In order to evaluate, compare, and tune graph algorithms, experiments on well designed benchmark sets have to be performed. Together with the goal of reproducibility of experimental results, this creates a demand for a public archive to gather and store graph instances. Such an archive would ideally allow annotation of instances or sets of graphs with additional information like graph properties and references to the respective experiments and results. Here we examine the requirements, and introduce a new community project with the aim of producing an easily accessible library of graphs. Through successful community involvement, it is expected that the archive will contain a representative selection of both real-world and generated graph instances, covering significant application areas as well as interesting classes of graphs.</p> </blockquote> <p>Visit <a href="http://graphdrawing.org/grapharchive/" rel="nofollow">http://graphdrawing.org/grapharchive/</a> to see their nascent effort.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/79541#79541 Answer by sisn for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? sisn 2011-10-30T19:34:05Z 2011-10-31T01:01:44Z <p>A list of theorems (and the formalization) that have been formalized in some proof assistant e.g. coq. Maybe not so much for now but for the future. s.t. work is not unnecessarily done to often.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68442/what-could-be-some-potentially-useful-mathematical-databases/79619#79619 Answer by Sam Nead for What could be some potentially useful mathematical databases? Sam Nead 2011-10-31T12:48:14Z 2011-10-31T12:48:14Z <p><a href="http://www.indiana.edu/~knotinfo/" rel="nofollow">KnotInfo</a>. The three-manifold and knot censuses included with <a href="http://www.math.uic.edu/t3m/SnapPy/" rel="nofollow">SnapPy</a>. Also relevant is <a href="http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~nmd/computop/index.html" rel="nofollow">CompuTop</a>, a list of "topological" software. </p>