Involution on Hyperelliptic curves and their Jacobians - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-20T08:47:24Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/64839http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/64839/involution-on-hyperelliptic-curves-and-their-jacobiansInvolution on Hyperelliptic curves and their JacobiansRex2011-05-12T21:25:29Z2011-05-12T22:20:13Z
<p>Let $X$ be a hyperelliptic curve and let $i:X\to X$ denote the hyperelliptic involution. Once we fix a point $x_0\in X$ we get the Abel-Jacobi map $AJ:X\to J$ where $J$ denotes the Jacobian variety. Now the Jacobian is also equipped with an involution, namely $x\mapsto x^{-1}$. Is it possible to choose the base point $x_0$ in such a way that the restriction of the involution on the Jacobian is the involution on $X$. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/64839/involution-on-hyperelliptic-curves-and-their-jacobians/64845#64845Answer by Dan Petersen for Involution on Hyperelliptic curves and their JacobiansDan Petersen2011-05-12T21:47:42Z2011-05-12T21:47:42Z<p>Yes, pick $x_0$ to be a Weierstrass point, i.e. a fixed point of the hyperelliptic involution. </p>
<p>Let $\sigma$ denote the hyperelliptic involution on $X$. Under the Abel-Jacobi map we have $x \mapsto [x-x_0]$ and $\sigma(x) \mapsto [\sigma(x) - x_0]$. Now $[x + \sigma(x) - 2x_0]$ is the divisor of a function, since it is the pullback under the hyperelliptic map of a degree zero divisor on $\mathbf P^1$. Hence $AJ(x)$ and $AJ(\sigma(x))$ are inverses.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/64839/involution-on-hyperelliptic-curves-and-their-jacobians/64848#64848Answer by Simon Rose for Involution on Hyperelliptic curves and their JacobiansSimon Rose2011-05-12T22:20:13Z2011-05-12T22:20:13Z<p>Another way to think of this is the following (at least over $\mathbb{C}$).</p>
<p>Consider the diagram
$$
\begin{array}{ccccc}
X & \xrightarrow{AJ \times AJ \circ \sigma} & J \times J & & \\
\downarrow & & \downarrow & & \\
\mathbb{P}^1 & \to & Sym^2J & \xrightarrow{+} & J
\end{array}.
$$
Note that the composition along the bottom row must be constant, as there are no non-trivial maps from $\mathbb{P}^1$ to any Abelian variety.</p>
<p>What this tells you is that $f(x) = AJ(x) + AJ\big(\sigma(x)\big)$ is constant. So if you translate it (i.e. choose a different basepoint):
$$
\tilde{AJ}(x) = AJ(x) - \frac{f(x)}{2}
$$
then you find that the corresponding $\tilde{f}(x) = 0$ for all $x$. That is, the two involutions agree with each other as desired.</p>