Sets, Universes, and the small Yoneda Lemma - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-06-19T12:14:36Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/6440 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/6440/sets-universes-and-the-small-yoneda-lemma Sets, Universes, and the small Yoneda Lemma Harry Gindi 2009-11-22T07:39:03Z 2011-12-16T13:09:58Z <p>Suppose we fix a universe $U$ and a $U$-small category $C$. The regular Yoneda lemma gives us some locally small (not necessarily locally U-small?) functor category $C'=[C^{op},Sets]$ with a fully faithful embedding $C\rightarrow C'$ and the canonical bijection between $Nat(F,Hom(-,x))$ and $F(X)$. Suppose we consider now, the U-small Yoneda lemma, that is, we look at $[C^{op},U-Sets]$. This is well-behaved since even though it is not U-small, $Ob([C^{op},U-Sets])$ is still a set. </p> <p>So the main question I have is: Are there any useful properties of the standard Yoneda lemma that we cannot reproduce with the $U$-small Yoneda lemma for some $U$?</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/6440/sets-universes-and-the-small-yoneda-lemma/6505#6505 Answer by Mike Shulman for Sets, Universes, and the small Yoneda Lemma Mike Shulman 2009-11-23T01:43:18Z 2009-11-23T01:43:18Z <p>Well, for any universe U, the U-small sets satisfy the axioms of ZFC (or whatever your preferred set theory is). Therefore, anything that we can prove in ZFC about the Yoneda embedding into "all" presheaves will also be true about the Yoneda embedding into U-small presheaves. So on that score, the answer would seem to be "no."</p> <p>There might be other interpretations that would make the answer "yes," since in vanilla ZFC every class is definable, whereas not every U-large set is definable in terms of U-small ones. Thus an informal statement like "for every large thingumbob X, ..." might be true in ZFC, but no longer provable relative to a universe, since the meaning of "large" has changed (unless we change the quantifier to "for every U-small-definable large thingumbob X"). This doesn't contradict the first observation, since such a statement cannot be a single theorem of ZFC, only a meta-theorem, and each instance of the meta-theorem is about a particular definable class and therefore still true about the corresponding U-small-definable U-large set. However, right now I can't think of any interesting or useful properties of the Yoneda embedding that would fall under this heading.</p> <p>So I think that probably the answer is still "no."</p>