A question about $\aleph_1-$closed forcing notions. - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-20T14:46:29Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/64280http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/64280/a-question-about-aleph-1-closed-forcing-notionsA question about $\aleph_1-$closed forcing notions.Mohammad2011-05-08T10:35:27Z2011-09-04T05:48:12Z
<p>Is it consistent that every non-trivial $\aleph_1-$closed forcing notion of size $2^{\aleph_0}$ (which is trivially the minimal size of such forcing notions) collapses some cardinals? (we can ask the same question for larger cardinals.)</p>
<p>Remark:
This statement follows trivially from "Foreman`s maximality principle" which states that every non-trivial forcing notion either adds a real or collapses some cardinals. As far as I know the consistency of this principle is unknown.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/64280/a-question-about-aleph-1-closed-forcing-notions/73254#73254Answer by Norman Lewis Perlmutter for A question about $\aleph_1-$closed forcing notions.Norman Lewis Perlmutter2011-08-20T00:40:49Z2011-08-20T00:40:49Z<p>I can't answer your question, but I can give a simpler sounding formulation that might be helpful. Analyze the question in two cases.</p>
<p>Case 1: The continuum hypothesis holds
<br>
In this case, the statement is false, because any $<\aleph_1$ -closed forcing of size $\aleph_1$ cannot collapse cardinals. The forcing to add a cohen subset to $\aleph_1$ is a nontrivial example of such a forcing. </p>
<p>Case 2: The continuum hypothesis fails
<br>
In this case, it is a theorem that every $<\aleph_1$-closed forcing notion which collapses a cardinal collapses the continuum. (See <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/11633/is-it-possible-for-countably-closed-forcing-to-collapse-aleph-2-to-aleph-1%20%22this%20question%22" rel="nofollow">this question</a>, referenced by Joel in the comments.) But every such forcing is equivalent to the canonical collapse forcing to collapse the continuum to $\aleph_1$. The most general version of this latter theorem that I know of (although the degree of generality makes it hard to follow) can be found in Handbook of Boolean Algebras, Volume 2, Corollary 1.15. </p>
<p>So really, your question boils down to whether every $<\aleph_1$-closed forcing of size continuum is isomorphic to Coll$(\aleph_1, c)$ This sounds strange to me, but I can't prove it's false, and if Foreman is entertaining it, who am I to judge it?</p>