Least number of non-zero coefficients to describe a degree n polynomial - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-19T20:29:18Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/6276 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/6276/least-number-of-non-zero-coefficients-to-describe-a-degree-n-polynomial Least number of non-zero coefficients to describe a degree n polynomial Thomas Sauvaget 2009-11-20T15:42:07Z 2010-03-26T22:25:20Z <p>I'd be grateful for a good reference on this, it feels like a classic subject yet I couldn't find much about it. </p> <p>Polynomials in one variable of the form $x^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\dots +a_1 x+a_0$ can be transformed into simpler expressions. For instance <a href="http://homepage.mac.com/ehgoins/ma598/lecture%5F27.pdf" rel="nofollow">it is apparently well-known</a> that the Tschirnhaus transformation allows to bring <em>any</em> quintic into so-called Bring-Jerrard form $x^5+ax+b$, while for degree 6 one needs at least three coefficents $x^6+ax^2+bx+c$.</p> <p>Is there a name for such "generalized Bring-Jerrard form", and what is known about it? In particular there is a cryptic footnote of Arnold (page 3 of <a href="http://www.pdmi.ras.ru/~arnsem/Arnold/arnlect1.ps.gz" rel="nofollow">this lecture</a>) where he says roughly that the degrees for which more coefficients are needed occur along "a rather strange infinite sequence": could someone please describe what those degrees are (I had a look at the OEIS but I believe that sequence is different from <a href="http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A000905" rel="nofollow">Hamilton numbers</a>, and couldn't find a relevant one).</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/6276/least-number-of-non-zero-coefficients-to-describe-a-degree-n-polynomial/6474#6474 Answer by Scott Morrison for Least number of non-zero coefficients to describe a degree n polynomial Scott Morrison 2009-11-22T19:06:34Z 2009-11-22T19:06:34Z <p>You might have a look at <a href="http://www.sigsam.org/bulletin/articles/145/Adamchik.pdf" rel="nofollow">Polynomial Transformations of Tschirnhaus, Bring and Jerrard</a>. It gives more explicit detail on why you can remove the first three terms after the leading term (covering the cases of degree 5 and 6 you mention above), but it does concentrate on degree 5.</p> <p>Hamilton's <a href="http://www.maths.tcd.ie/pub/HistMath/People/Hamilton/Jerrard/Jerrard.pdf" rel="nofollow">1836 paper</a> on Jerrard's original work has an elementary explanation of the technique (much of the paper concentrates on showing that certain other reductions Jerrard proposed, including a general degree 6 polynomial to a degree 5, were "illusory"). It also explains Jerrard's trick for eliminating the 2nd, 3rd and 5th terms. Finally, Jerrard has a method for eliminating the second and fourth terms, while bringing the third and fifth coefficients into any specified ratio: this only works in degree 7 or above (Jerrard had mistakenly thought this worked generally, and thus solved the general quintic by reducing it to de Moivre's solvable form -- this all predates Abel's work!)</p> <p>If by "Bring-Jerrard" form you just mean a certain number of the initial terms (after the first) have been eliminated, then the Hamilton numbers you linked to are indeed exactly what you want.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/6276/least-number-of-non-zero-coefficients-to-describe-a-degree-n-polynomial/19469#19469 Answer by Bjorn Poonen for Least number of non-zero coefficients to describe a degree n polynomial Bjorn Poonen 2010-03-26T22:25:20Z 2010-03-26T22:25:20Z <p>The modern notion of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essential_dimension" rel="nofollow">essential dimension</a> of a group gives a precise way to state your question (and generalizations), and there is some recent work extending the work mentioned in Scott's answer. To get started, see the article</p> <p><a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&amp;fid=298797&amp;jid=&amp;volumeId=&amp;issueId=02&amp;aid=298796&amp;bodyId=&amp;membershipNumber=&amp;societyETOCSession=" rel="nofollow">J. Buhler and Z. Reichstein, On the essential dimension of a group, <em>Compositio Math.</em> <strong>106</strong> (1997), 159-179.</a></p> <p>For instance, it is proved there that for polynomials of degree $n$, at least <code>$\lfloor n/2 \rfloor$</code> coefficients are required. (This agrees with what you mentioned for $n=5$ and $n=6$.)</p>