Prime Number Theorem w/o Complex Analysis - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-24T15:01:52Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/60607http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/60607/prime-number-theorem-w-o-complex-analysisPrime Number Theorem w/o Complex AnalysisLowerBounds2011-04-04T20:50:21Z2011-07-08T17:36:12Z
<p>I know about</p>
<p>"Simple analytic proof of the prime number theorem" Newman, 1980</p>
<p>However, is there a proof of the Prime Number Theorem without the use of complex analysis? (Real analysis is fine).</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/60607/prime-number-theorem-w-o-complex-analysis/60611#60611Answer by Charles Matthews for Prime Number Theorem w/o Complex AnalysisCharles Matthews2011-04-04T21:12:58Z2011-04-04T21:12:58Z<p><a href="http://www.math.columbia.edu/~goldfeld/ErdosSelbergDispute.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.math.columbia.edu/~goldfeld/ErdosSelbergDispute.pdf</a> explains the classic proof in context (there is what amounts to a priority dispute).</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/60607/prime-number-theorem-w-o-complex-analysis/60622#60622Answer by Gerry Myerson for Prime Number Theorem w/o Complex AnalysisGerry Myerson2011-04-05T00:06:39Z2011-04-05T00:06:39Z<p>Another exposition of an elementary proof (that is, a proof not using complex analysis) is in Gerald Tenenbaum and Michel Mendes France, The Prime Numbers and Their Distribution, which is Volume 6 of the Student Mathematical Library, published by the American Mathematical Society. The proof they give is due to Daboussi, from 1984. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/60607/prime-number-theorem-w-o-complex-analysis/60840#60840Answer by M Mueger for Prime Number Theorem w/o Complex AnalysisM Mueger2011-04-06T17:38:38Z2011-04-06T17:38:38Z<p>A nice exposition of an Erdos/Selberg-type elementary proof is given by Levinson in Amer. Math. Monthly 76 (1969) 225–245.</p>
<p>The proof by Daboussi as written up by Tenenbaum and Mendes-France was already mentioned.</p>
<p>Yet another one is due to Hildebrand in Mathematika 33 (1986) 23–30. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/60607/prime-number-theorem-w-o-complex-analysis/60844#60844Answer by Emerton for Prime Number Theorem w/o Complex AnalysisEmerton2011-04-06T18:51:30Z2011-04-06T18:51:30Z<p>There is a terrific exposition of the elementary proof by Terry Tao, available as the file prime.dvi <a href="http://www.math.ucla.edu/~tao/preprints/Expository/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. A more traditional exposition is available in Edwards's book <em>Riemann's zeta function</em>.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/60607/prime-number-theorem-w-o-complex-analysis/69809#69809Answer by Richard Dore for Prime Number Theorem w/o Complex AnalysisRichard Dore2011-07-08T17:36:12Z2011-07-08T17:36:12Z<p>If you just want $\pi(n) = \Omega \left( \frac{n}{\log n} \right)$, good enough for many applications, here is a quick proof: The highest power of a prime $p$ dividing $2n \choose n$ is at most $2n$ -- you get at most one more factor of $p$ in the numerator than denominator for each power $p^i \leq 2n$. This tells you that ${2n \choose n} \leq (2n)^{\pi(2n)}$. So $\pi(2n) \geq \frac{\log_2 {2n \choose n}}{\log_2 (2n)} \geq \frac{n}{\log_2 (2n)}$.</p>