Maximum of a function on $d-$dimensional convex compact sets - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-24T18:28:41Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/60191http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/60191/maximum-of-a-function-on-d-dimensional-convex-compact-setsMaximum of a function on $d-$dimensional convex compact setsRoland Bacher2011-03-31T14:08:09Z2011-03-31T15:16:13Z
<p>Let $\mathcal C_d$ denote the set of all $d-$dimensional convex compact subsets with
barycenter at the origin of the $d$-dimensional Euclidean space $\mathbb E^d$. Given an
element $C\in\mathcal C_d$ with boundary $\partial C$, define $\Sigma_0\subset
\partial C$ by $\Sigma_0=\partial C\cap(-\partial C)$. The complement $\partial C\setminus
\Sigma_0$ is open and can be partitioned into two open subsets
$\Sigma_\pm$ defined by
$$\Sigma_-=\lbrace P\in\partial C\vert -P\in\mathrm{Int}(C)\rbrace$$
and
$$\Sigma_+=\lbrace P\in \partial C\vert -P\not\in C\rbrace\ .$$
Set $\rho(C)=\mathrm{Area}(\Sigma_+)/\mathrm{Area}(\Sigma_-)$
(using the convention $\rho(C)=1$ if $\Sigma_+=\Sigma_-=\emptyset$ which happens exactly if
$C$ is centrally symmetric) where $\mathrm{Area}(\Sigma_\pm)$ is the $(d-1)$ dimensional
area.</p>
<p>The function $\rho:\mathcal C_d\longrightarrow [1,\infty)$
is invariant under the action of the linear group on $\mathcal C_d$ and is bounded.
What is its maximal value (and on which convex sets is it achieved)?</p>
<p>Added: My argument for the invariance under the linear group is flawed. I am also no longer
sure that $\rho$ is bounded (my proof used invariance under the linear group).</p>
<p>(Added after a moments thought: One remedy is to replace $\rho(C)$ by $\mathrm{Vol}(C)/\mathrm{Vol}(C\cap(-C))$
which is obviously invariant under linear transformations and which is bounded.)</p>
<p>A probably naive guess for the maximum is the value of $\rho$ on a simplex.
In dimension $2$, one gets $\rho(\Delta)=2$ if $\Delta\in\mathcal C_2$ is a triangle
and in dimension $3$ one gets $\rho(\Delta)=3$ for $\Delta$ a simplex in $\mathcal C_3$.
I ignore the value of $\rho$ on simplices of dimension $\geq 4$ (question <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/60167/name-of-a-polytope" rel="nofollow">http://mathoverflow.net/questions/60167/name-of-a-polytope</a> is motivated by the computation of these values).</p>
<p>A similar invariant which has perhaps been studied is obtained by considering
$\lambda_C=\max_L_+\mathrm{length}(L_+\cap C)/\mathrm{length}((-L_+)\cap C)$
where the maximum is over the set of all half-lines rooted at the origin.
The invariant $\lambda(C)$ is also bounded and invariant under the action of the linear group on $\mathcal C_d$. (Here I am sure since this is obvious.)</p>