formal smoothness versus reducedness - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-23T10:29:35Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/58534http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/58534/formal-smoothness-versus-reducednessformal smoothness versus reducednessunknown2011-03-15T14:03:10Z2011-03-15T16:28:32Z
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I have the following situation: $R,H$ schemes (can be assumed noetherian and of finite type) over a field $k$ which we can assume to be algebraically closed, with $H$ reduced, $Y\subset R\times \mathbb{P}_k^n$ an open subset, $p:Y\rightarrow R$ the restriction of the projection onto the first factor and $w:Y\rightarrow H$ a surjective formally smooth morphism. How can I show that $R$ is reduced? Thank you</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/58534/formal-smoothness-versus-reducedness/58544#58544Answer by Emerton for formal smoothness versus reducednessEmerton2011-03-15T16:16:59Z2011-03-15T16:16:59Z<p>Since $H$ is reduced and $Y$ is smooth over $H$ (I am assuming that everything is finite type over $k$, so smooth and formally smooth are the same) we see that $Y$ is reduced.</p>
<p>So the problem is the following: show that if $Y \subset R \times \mathbb P^n$ is open and reduced, and the projection $Y \to R$ is surjective (taking into account the remark to this effect in the comments), then $R$ is reduced. </p>
<p>Here is the proof:
Let $x$ be a point of $R$, and let $y$ be a point of $Y$ lying over $x$. Recalling
that $\mathbb P^n$ is the union of $n + 1$ open subsets isomorphic to
$\mathbb A^n$, we may assume
that $y \in R\times \mathbb A^n$ (for an appropriate choice of one of these $n+1$ copies).
The stalk $\mathcal O_{Y,y}$ is then equal to a localization of $\mathcal O_{R,x}[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$. It is reduced by assumption, and so $\mathcal O_{R,x}$ is reduced.
Since $x \in R$ was arbitrary, we see that $R$ is reduced.</p>