Compact Hypersurfaces Bounding Compact Domains - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-24T11:16:50Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/56642http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/56642/compact-hypersurfaces-bounding-compact-domainsCompact Hypersurfaces Bounding Compact DomainsT-'2011-02-25T15:54:05Z2011-02-25T22:38:02Z
<p>The following statement seems to be taken as given in papers I'm reading:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Let $\mathcal{M}^n$ be a compact, embedded hypersurface in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$. Then $\mathcal{M}$ is the boundary of some compact domain $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^
{n+1}$.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Is this an elementary result? I feel there must be some algebraic topology argument here. Any suggestions?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/56642/compact-hypersurfaces-bounding-compact-domains/56654#56654Answer by BS for Compact Hypersurfaces Bounding Compact DomainsBS2011-02-25T17:49:31Z2011-02-25T22:38:02Z<p>There are several ways to see this fact, which is a simple instance of <a href="https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Alexander_duality" rel="nofollow">Alexander duality</a>.
Here is the simplest I know.</p>
<p>Let $H$ be a compact smooth hypersurface in $\mathbb{R}^n$, whithout boundary, and $x\in \mathbb{R}^n\setminus H$.
Then the radial projection $p_x : H \to \mathbb{S}^{n-1}$, $y\mapsto (y-x)/\|y-x\|$ has a degree mod $2$, say $d_x$, which may be defined as the number of elements mod $2$ of $p_x^{-1}(u)$ for almost all $u\in\mathbb{S}^{n-1}$ (this is well-defined by transversality theory). Then the subset of $x\in \mathbb{R}^n$ such that $d_x=1$ is your $\Omega$, a relatively compact open set with boundary $H$.
EDIT : here one must assume $n>1$, as in Mohan's answer, otherwise the relative compactness might not hold.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/56642/compact-hypersurfaces-bounding-compact-domains/56656#56656Answer by Sándor Kovács for Compact Hypersurfaces Bounding Compact DomainsSándor Kovács2011-02-25T17:51:49Z2011-02-25T17:51:49Z<p>This sounds like a higher dimensional version of the Jordan curve theorem, known as the <em>Jordan-Brouwer separation theorem</em>. See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_curve_theorem" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>Already the Jordan curve theorem is highly non-trivial, so I would say this is also.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/56642/compact-hypersurfaces-bounding-compact-domains/56669#56669Answer by Mohan Ramachandran for Compact Hypersurfaces Bounding Compact DomainsMohan Ramachandran2011-02-25T19:27:43Z2011-02-25T20:14:42Z<p>An alternate argument to the one given by BS in the smooth case is to note that by the
implicit funcion theorem the hypersurface is locally two sided.If it is not globally
two sided then one can construct a connected two sheeted covering of euclidean space
which is a contradiction.Then we note that euclidean space in dimension atleast two has
one end.This implies that the complement of the hypersurface has one nonrelatively compact
component and the result follows.This proof works for any closed embedded locally two sided
hpersurface.</p>