Commutative diagrams for groups - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-20T22:15:23Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/55641http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/55641/commutative-diagrams-for-groupsCommutative diagrams for groupsHans Stricker2011-02-16T16:48:29Z2011-02-17T06:13:11Z
<p>You can present a group in a Cayley-like manner, replacing colors by explicit assignment of nodes to edges: while in a Cayley graph $x \circ y = z$ is presented like this:</p>
<p><img src="http://yoga-hebamme.de/mathoverflow/cayley.png" alt="alt text"></p>
<p>you can also present it like this:</p>
<p><img src="http://yoga-hebamme.de/mathoverflow/cayley2.png" alt="alt text"></p>
<p>Now the group axioms can be stated like this:</p>
<ul>
<li>For each $x, y$ there is a unique $z$ with $x \circ y = z$, or: such that the following diagram holds ("commutes"):</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://yoga-hebamme.de/mathoverflow/cayley2.png" alt="alt text"></p>
<ul>
<li>There is an $e$ such that for all $x$ it holds that $x\circ e = e \circ x = x$, or: such that the following two diagrams commute:</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://yoga-hebamme.de/mathoverflow/neutral.png" alt="alt text"></p>
<p>and for each $x$ there is a $x^{-1}$ such that $x \circ x^{-1} = x^{-1} \circ x = e$, or: such that the following diagram commutes:</p>
<p><img src="http://yoga-hebamme.de/mathoverflow/inverse.png" alt="alt text"></p>
<ul>
<li>For each $x, y, z$ it holds that $x \circ (y \circ z) = (x \circ y) \circ z$, or: such that the following diagram commutes:</li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://yoga-hebamme.de/mathoverflow/assoc.png" alt="alt text"></p>
<p>The last diagram is somewhat ugly, even when drawn in this most balanced way (I didn't find a more appealing and symmetric one).</p>
<p>But an astonishing symmetry arises, when we consider Abelian groups. Commutativity is expressed by the diagram:</p>
<p><img src="http://yoga-hebamme.de/mathoverflow/commut.png" alt="alt text"></p>
<p>and associativity becomes:</p>
<p><img src="http://yoga-hebamme.de/mathoverflow/assoc2.png" alt="alt text"></p>
<p>In the presence of commutativity, associativity seems to be related to commutativity (some sort of "second level commutativity").</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Can any use be made of this kind of diagrams, or is it
just vain baublery?</p>
</blockquote>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/55641/commutative-diagrams-for-groups/55697#55697Answer by S. Carnahan for Commutative diagrams for groupsS. Carnahan2011-02-17T06:13:11Z2011-02-17T06:13:11Z<p>These pictures are a way of writing a group as an algebra over an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operad_theory" rel="nofollow">operad</a>. The little square is the 2-ary operation, and the arrows are an indicator that makes the inputs distinguishable.</p>
<p>John Baez has written about operads using pictures similar to yours. See for example <a href="http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week191.html" rel="nofollow">TWF week 191</a>.</p>
<p>The relation between associativity and commutativity is similar to a fact seen in some books on vertex algebras, where one starts with an axiom like $x(yz) = y(xz)$ and after some power series manipulations deduces $x(yz) = (xy)z$. </p>