Is there evidence whether undergraduate math courses improve problem-solving? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-23T05:09:52Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/54769 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/54769/is-there-evidence-whether-undergraduate-math-courses-improve-problem-solving Is there evidence whether undergraduate math courses improve problem-solving? Anna Varvak 2011-02-08T14:53:43Z 2011-02-11T11:47:40Z <p>The most commonly stated reason for why mathematics should be a required condition for graduating is }to improve problem-solving skills". Usually it's taken for granted that taking a mathematics course does improve one's ability to solve problems. Does anyone know of any studies that either back that up or contradict it?</p> <p>Edit: I would also be interested in studies backing up claims that taking a math course improves logical reasoning, especially for mathematics courses for non-majors.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/54769/is-there-evidence-whether-undergraduate-math-courses-improve-problem-solving/55099#55099 Answer by Joel Reyes Noche for Is there evidence whether undergraduate math courses improve problem-solving? Joel Reyes Noche 2011-02-11T06:48:21Z 2011-02-11T06:48:21Z <p>(I don't think my answer directly answers the question, but I'm hoping it would be useful.)</p> <p>I assume that when you say "problem solving" you mean mathematical "problem-solving as a skill" ("being able to obtain solutions to the problems other people give you to solve," Schoenfeld, 1992).</p> <p>I was unable to find any studies that answer the question "Does taking an <em>ordinary</em> undergraduate mathematics course improve one's ability to solve (mathematical) problems?" (where ordinary means the instruction is not explicitly targeted at improving problem solving skills).</p> <p>But there have been studies that show that undergraduates taking certain "problem-solving courses" experienced "marked shifts in [their] problem solving behavior" (e.g., Schoenfeld, 1987, p. 207).</p> <p>As I understand it, researchers in mathematics education usually don't consider questions of the type "does the <em>ordinary</em> way of teaching improve this skill/understanding?" important (where "ordinary" is usually referred to as "traditional"). They usually consider it more valuable to ask questions of the type "what way of teaching will improve this skill/understanding?"</p> <p>A good reference is</p> <p>Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), <em>Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning</em> (pp. 334-370). New York: MacMillan.</p> <p>which uses some material from</p> <p>Schoenfeld, A. H. (Ed.). (1987). <em>Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education</em>. New Jersey: Erlbaum.</p> <p>Chapter 2 (Foundations of cognitive theory and research for mathematics problem-solving, by E. A. Silver) and Chapter 8 (What's all the fuss about metacognition? by A. H. Schoenfeld) of the 1987 Schoenfeld book are particularly useful.</p>