Reference: Learning noncommutative geometry and C^* algebras - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T15:34:17Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/54186http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/54186/reference-learning-noncommutative-geometry-and-c-algebrasReference: Learning noncommutative geometry and C^* algebrasQuetzalcube2011-02-03T11:27:41Z2011-02-05T02:55:33Z
<p>I am starting to study noncommutative geometry and C^* algebras so my question is</p>
<p><strong>Does anyone knows a good reference on this subject?</strong></p>
<p>I would like a basic book with intuitions for definitions and this kind of things. I come from algebraic geometry so if it talks a bit about the relation with it would be highly appreciated.</p>
<p>I have already taken a look to Conne's book but I find it too hard and I'm currently studying Landi's but it lacks lots of proofs (he refers to several papers)</p>
<p>Thanks in advance</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/54186/reference-learning-noncommutative-geometry-and-c-algebras/54187#54187Answer by Stefan Waldmann for Reference: Learning noncommutative geometry and C^* algebrasStefan Waldmann2011-02-03T11:36:26Z2011-02-03T11:48:35Z<p>For $C^*$-algebras in general, there are many textbooks. Famous names are e.g. the two volume book by Kadison&Ringrose or the (by now somehow old but still very nice) book by Sakai.
I also enjoyed the encyclopedic book by Blackadar as well as the three volumes by Takesaki (mainly von Neumann algebras, though). For more physics applications, the two volume book by Bratteli&Robinson is nice (though not many proofs). For many reasons you also might want to take a look into Rudin's two books on Real&Complex Analysis and Functional analysis.</p>
<p>More NCG like things you can find in Gracia-Bondía, Várilly, and Figueroa.
Though there is certainly no way around Connes' book :)</p>
<p>I guess that is enough for a first reading, hope that helps</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/54186/reference-learning-noncommutative-geometry-and-c-algebras/54188#54188Answer by BY for Reference: Learning noncommutative geometry and C^* algebrasBY2011-02-03T12:18:17Z2011-02-03T12:18:17Z<p>For $C^{\star}$-algebras I would suggest in addition the lovely book of Gerard Murphy "$C^\star$-algebras and operator theory". </p>
<p>If you are interested in K-Theory Blackadar's "K-Theory for Operator algebras" might be a good choice after Murphy's book. </p>
<p>For Noncommutative Geometry, there are nice little introductory books by Varilly "An Introduction to Noncommutative Geometry" and Khalkhali "Basic Noncommutative Geometry". They are maybe more "beginner friendly" than Connes' master piece. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/54186/reference-learning-noncommutative-geometry-and-c-algebras/54189#54189Answer by Paul Siegel for Reference: Learning noncommutative geometry and C^* algebrasPaul Siegel2011-02-03T12:28:24Z2011-02-03T12:28:24Z<p>First of all, let me mention that functional analysis plays a similar role in noncommutative geometry that commutative algebra plays in algebraic geometry, and it pays off to at least have a reference handy. To that end, I recommend "Banach Algebra Techniques in Operator Theory" by Ronald Douglas: it develops the essentials of elementary C* algebra theory completely from scratch (the first chapter is on Banach Spaces). From there, I recommend starting with Higson and Roe's "Analytic K-homology". The book offers a self-contained introduction to C*-algebra theory and operator K-theory and it culminates in a very detailed exposition of the K-homological proof of the Atiyah-Singer index theorem. This is all foundational material in noncommutative geometry in the sense that much of the rest of the subject is organized around these tools.</p>
<p>For example, Connes developed cyclic homology so that he could generalize the Chern character map from topological K-theory (AKA K-theory for commutative C* algebras) to K-theory for noncommutative C*-algebras. Likewise, the inspiration for the the notion of a spectral triple came from the index pairing between K-theory and K-homology: a spectral triple consists of a representation of a C*-algebra on Hilbert space together with an unbounded operator which is compatible with the representation, while a K-homology class is represented by a representation of a C*-algebra on Hilbert space together with a bounded operator which is compatible with the representation. In both cases, the point is to capture some feature of the Atiyah-Singer index theorem and generalize it to the noncommutative setting.</p>
<p>So once you've assimilated enough of Analytic K-homology, it probably wouldn't be quite so hard to go back and tackle some of the literature. Connes' book is of course great with the right background, but you might find his very well written paper "Noncommutative Differential Geometry" easier to tackle. At that point you will have to decide where you want to go: one can dig deeper into noncommutative geometry proper, or one can pursue interactions between noncommutative geometry and conventional geometry and topology. There is also "noncommutative measure theory" built around Von Neumann algebras, but I know much less about that side of things.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/54186/reference-learning-noncommutative-geometry-and-c-algebras/54385#54385Answer by Andreas Holmstrom for Reference: Learning noncommutative geometry and C^* algebrasAndreas Holmstrom2011-02-05T02:55:33Z2011-02-05T02:55:33Z<p>A while ago Lieven Le Bruyn put together a list called "Top 10 noncommutative geometry books for newbies", with a short description/review of each book. Check <a href="http://www.noncommutative.org/index.php/top-10-noncommutative-geometry-books-for-newbies/" rel="nofollow">this link</a>.</p>