Norms of higher derivatives of mappings between Riemannian manifolds - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T14:58:47Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/51839http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/51839/norms-of-higher-derivatives-of-mappings-between-riemannian-manifoldsNorms of higher derivatives of mappings between Riemannian manifoldsJaap Eldering2011-01-12T11:23:54Z2011-01-12T16:17:37Z
<p>Let $M, N$ be Riemannian manifolds and $f: M \to N$ be a smooth map
(I'm actually only considering diffeomorphisms (flows)
$\Phi^t: M \to M$, but just for the sake of generality).</p>
<p>The first derivative of $f$ can be understood as its tangent map
$T f: T M \to T N$. Higher derivatives can abstractly be viewed as
maps between higher order tangent bundles.</p>
<p>I want to make estimates on the (operator norm) size of these higher
derivatives. In the higher order tangent spaces (see also the recent
question <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2019/" rel="nofollow">http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2019/</a>) I'd have to use
induced metrics, which I don't readily know how to work with, and besides,
I think these would include the base, lower order derivatives as well.</p>
<p>I would prefer to keep things defined on the tangent/tensor bundle, in
a similar way as taking covariant derivatives for vector fields, but I
don't know how to do this for for maps $f: M \to N$.</p>
<p>So my question roughly is: are there natural/practical representations
of norms of higher order derivatives of maps between manifolds?</p>
<p>One thing I did come up with is representing $f$ in normal coordinates, as these are the most canonical charts and then use the norms in the tangent spaces at the argument and image points $x$ and $y = f(x)$.</p>
<p>(The basis for this question is that I want to obtain a Gronwall-like
growth estimate for the higher derivatives of a flow $\Phi^t$ in
terms of the exponential growth of its tangent flow $D \Phi^t$.)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51839/norms-of-higher-derivatives-of-mappings-between-riemannian-manifolds/51856#51856Answer by Deane Yang for Norms of higher derivatives of mappings between Riemannian manifoldsDeane Yang2011-01-12T16:17:37Z2011-01-12T16:17:37Z<p>You could indeed pull back each tensor bundle of $N$ via the map $f$ to $M$ and use the naturally induced metric and connection to define norms of higher covariant derivatives of $f$. You can do this for every order greater than or equal to $1$. Depending on your needs, this might work fine.</p>
<p>If you need something that will work under weaker a priori assumptions, then you might need to embed $N$ isometrically into a higher dimensional Euclidean space (via Nash's theorem) and treat $f$ as a vector-valued function. This allows you to work with maps $f$ that are not necessarily continuous and define its weak derivatives. This is often used in the study of harmonic maps.</p>