Is the existence of a well-ordering on R independent of ZF? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-22T07:15:19Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/5116http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/5116/is-the-existence-of-a-well-ordering-on-r-independent-of-zfIs the existence of a well-ordering on R independent of ZF?Qiaochu Yuan2009-11-11T22:48:53Z2009-11-12T00:13:08Z
<p>I am reasonably certain this is the case, but can't find a reference that actually states this, although the Wikipedia article states something close. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/5116/is-the-existence-of-a-well-ordering-on-r-independent-of-zf/5119#5119Answer by Ori Gurel-Gurevich for Is the existence of a well-ordering on R independent of ZF?Ori Gurel-Gurevich2009-11-11T23:02:07Z2009-11-11T23:02:07Z<p>It is possible to have all the subsets of R be measurable (Solovay, Robert M. (1970). "A model of set-theory in which every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable". Annals of Mathematics. Second Series 92: 1–56.) which implies the nonexistence of a well ordering of R.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/5116/is-the-existence-of-a-well-ordering-on-r-independent-of-zf/5127#5127Answer by Richard Dore for Is the existence of a well-ordering on R independent of ZF?Richard Dore2009-11-12T00:02:04Z2009-11-12T00:13:08Z<p>Yes. Here's a sketched example:</p>
<p>Start in L. Let P be the forcing which adds ω<sub>1</sub> many Cohen reals, and let G be an L-generic filter for P. Then L(ℝ)<sup>L[G]</sup> will model ZF, but will have no well ordering of the reals. The point is that if σ is an automorphism of P, then
σ can be extended to an elementary map from L[G] to L[σ[G]], and this extension will fix L(ℝ)<sup>L[G]</sup>. So if there was a well ordering of ℝ in L(ℝ)<sup>L[G]</sup>, it would give a well ordering of G which was fixed by σ. But σ can reorder the elements of G because of the homogeneity of P.</p>