Are there any good websites for hosting discussions of mathematical papers? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-19T23:57:00Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/51056 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51056/are-there-any-good-websites-for-hosting-discussions-of-mathematical-papers Are there any good websites for hosting discussions of mathematical papers? maxdev 2011-01-03T20:14:46Z 2012-07-05T13:21:03Z <p>I was wondering if there are any websites out there which </p> <ul> <li>systematically provide space for the discussion of mathematics articles (particularly those on the arXiv, though not necessarily just those), and </li> <li>have a large enough user base to have some hope of having a good discussion (or at least have hope of attracting one in the near future).</li> </ul> <p>Of course, MO is not so far from such a site, but is organized around questions, not papers, which leads to rather different discussion in practice. Similarly, some blog posts and nLab pages serve this purpose, but are not created systematically. </p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51056/are-there-any-good-websites-for-hosting-discussions-of-mathematical-papers/51088#51088 Answer by Theo Johnson-Freyd for Are there any good websites for hosting discussions of mathematical papers? Theo Johnson-Freyd 2011-01-04T06:14:13Z 2011-01-04T06:14:13Z <p>I'm pretty sure the answer to the question as asked is "No". At present there does not seem to exist a unique web location dedicated to discussing each individual mathematical article.</p> <p>It would be technically feasible, and to my mind advantageous, to set up a "talk" page attached to each <a href="http://arxiv.org/" rel="nofollow">arXiv</a> article. I have seen this suggestion on various mathematical blogs (unfortunately, I can't remember which ones, and googling doesn't turn them up; this answer, like the question, is CW, so if you know of any, please just include a link). I certainly do not know enough about web design to draft such a system, and the folks who run the arXiv do, but are horribly overworked as it is, so I doubt that they'll be writing anything anytime soon. I encourage others with massive web-fu to create some code and send it towards the arXiv administrators, but they might not even have the time to look at it. (When you are thinking about how best to set up such a site, please do keep in mind that well-working online forums tend to have fairly heavy moderation. Moderator attention is definitely not sufficient to have a well-run site, and not strictly necessary, but it helps. Since there aren't nearly enough people out there eager to moderate random columns on the arXiv, one proposal I've seen is for arXiv authors to have the option to open a talk page, with the commitment that they themselves participate and moderate.) (Another thing to think about is how to convince NSF to fully underwrite the costs at arXiv.)</p> <p>Note that although most mathematics papers are available on arXiv, it is not the only database of papers. I could imagine adding a talk page to each bibliographic entry at <a href="http://www.numdam.org/?lang=en" rel="nofollow">Numdam</a>, for example, or to each article at <a href="http://apps.isiknowledge.com/" rel="nofollow">Web of Science</a>.</p> <p>Something like a "talk" page <em>does</em> exist for (almost) every (published) mathematical article, but I don't think it's what the question is after. <a href="http://www.ams.org/mathscinet/" rel="nofollow">MathSciNet</a> and <a href="http://www.zentralblatt-math.org/zmath/en/" rel="nofollow">Zentralblatt</a> include reviews of every (almost) article in their databases, written by experts. This does not accomplish the goal of "systematically provid[ing] space for the discussion of mathematics articles", but it is something.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51056/are-there-any-good-websites-for-hosting-discussions-of-mathematical-papers/51089#51089 Answer by Bruce Westbury for Are there any good websites for hosting discussions of mathematical papers? Bruce Westbury 2011-01-04T07:58:02Z 2011-01-04T07:58:02Z <p>Although no such system exists formally (as far as I know) there is an informal way to do this. Namely make some comments on a blog or web page and then add a trackback to the arXiv page. If this happened on a regular basis then it could be developed into something more systematic along the lines you are suggesting. My feeling is that only a small percentage of papers would attract any discussion.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51056/are-there-any-good-websites-for-hosting-discussions-of-mathematical-papers/51093#51093 Answer by Andrew Stacey for Are there any good websites for hosting discussions of mathematical papers? Andrew Stacey 2011-01-04T08:39:28Z 2011-01-04T08:39:28Z <p>Slightly facetiously, I'm mildly tempted to vote to close as a duplicate. However, I shan't and shall merely point out that most of the answers to the question: <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/13619/is-a-free-alternative-to-mathscinet-possible" rel="nofollow">http://mathoverflow.net/questions/13619/is-a-free-alternative-to-mathscinet-possible</a> are relevant to this question, particularly mine. The question <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/3038/errata-database" rel="nofollow">http://mathoverflow.net/questions/3038/errata-database</a> which covers similar ground.</p> <p>(The <a href="http://www.math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/rForum" rel="nofollow">rForum</a> mentioned in the latter has stalled a little. It could be revived if sufficient interest is shown.)</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51056/are-there-any-good-websites-for-hosting-discussions-of-mathematical-papers/51106#51106 Answer by Igor Pak for Are there any good websites for hosting discussions of mathematical papers? Igor Pak 2011-01-04T10:43:00Z 2011-01-04T10:48:21Z <p>I think this is a very reasonable question. It comes up often enough and deserves an answer. In fact, I see not one but two potential forums. Here is my take. </p> <p>1) Rumors, followup ideas, small errors, minor comments and remarks on the paper. This is all worth doing on your own blog space. I see no need to make this kind of discussion "official". In fact, the diversity of blogs and opinions is a plus here: less "intimidation by experts", fewer worries about "degeneration" of the discussion, etc. Finally, typos and mistakes in the paper are responsibilities of the author - when you find them, email them to her/him and stop worrying about other readers. In short, I see no need for a single forum for a discussion of this kind. </p> <p>2) Serious comments, substantial remarks, delicate technical problems with the paper, etc. I think a blog or wiki type discussion forum is a too informal/unserious for contributions of this kind. On a positive side, there is a perfect forum for this kind of discussions: it's called the arXiv! Remember, the arXiv was never meant to be a only a "free storage" of published papers. It has moderators, calls uploaded papers "submissions", and once approved, calls them "publications". A great feature of arXiv is that you can store and advertise there the kind of work that you don't intend to publish in traditional journals. So if you have something important to say to everyone, don't be shy, follow <a href="http://arxiv.org/pdf/0709.1291" rel="nofollow">Mnёv's example</a> and post it on the arXiv (<a href="http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0903/0903.3722.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a> <a href="http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0908/0908.0088v1.pdf" rel="nofollow">are</a> <a href="http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0004/0004090v1.pdf" rel="nofollow">some</a> <a href="http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1002/1002.0546v1.pdf" rel="nofollow">other</a> <a href="http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0907/0907.0898v1.pdf" rel="nofollow">examples</a>). Make sure to add hyperlinks to older arXiv papers if you want it to look more webby. Finally, there is already a <a href="http://scholar.google.com/" rel="nofollow">great tool</a> to explore forward arXiv citations. So why bother inventing a new forum when the one we have works fine, if only people used it more often for this purpose. </p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51056/are-there-any-good-websites-for-hosting-discussions-of-mathematical-papers/51108#51108 Answer by Marcin Kotowski for Are there any good websites for hosting discussions of mathematical papers? Marcin Kotowski 2011-01-04T11:08:42Z 2011-01-04T11:08:42Z <p>You can try SciRate (<a href="http://scirate.com/" rel="nofollow">http://scirate.com/</a>), a site that allows you to rate and comment papers from Arxiv (it updates the list of papers automatically). It doesn't seem to be very popular, though (lack of critical mass?).</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51056/are-there-any-good-websites-for-hosting-discussions-of-mathematical-papers/51110#51110 Answer by osdf for Are there any good websites for hosting discussions of mathematical papers? osdf 2011-01-04T11:25:50Z 2011-01-04T11:25:50Z <p>(This should be put in the thread right below the original question as it does not provide any answer, but I can't leave comments). Yan LeCun wrote down <a href="http://lecun.com/ex/pamphlets/publishing-models.html" rel="nofollow">some ideas</a> for a new publishing model/system for Computer Science, also talking about discussing/commenting papers. Reading the comments to this question, his suggestions seem quite relevant.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51056/are-there-any-good-websites-for-hosting-discussions-of-mathematical-papers/51253#51253 Answer by Kevin O'Bryant for Are there any good websites for hosting discussions of mathematical papers? Kevin O'Bryant 2011-01-05T22:21:24Z 2011-01-05T22:21:24Z <p>I just found <a href="http://math-arch.org/" rel="nofollow">http://math-arch.org/</a>, which seems to be exactly what is needed. I've created an account, but I don't yet have experience the site, so I can't comment on usability or comment quality.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51056/are-there-any-good-websites-for-hosting-discussions-of-mathematical-papers/51959#51959 Answer by Marius Kempe for Are there any good websites for hosting discussions of mathematical papers? Marius Kempe 2011-01-13T14:07:46Z 2011-01-13T14:07:46Z <p>There's a useful list of such sites at <a href="http://www.quora.com/What-are-some-websites-where-one-can-post-commentary-and-reviews-of-academic-papers" rel="nofollow">http://www.quora.com/What-are-some-websites-where-one-can-post-commentary-and-reviews-of-academic-papers</a>; the best of the lot, in my opinion, is:</p> <p>Annotatr<br> <a href="http://annotatr.appspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://annotatr.appspot.com/</a></p> <p>Try it out!</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51056/are-there-any-good-websites-for-hosting-discussions-of-mathematical-papers/101381#101381 Answer by Alexander Chervov for Are there any good websites for hosting discussions of mathematical papers? Alexander Chervov 2012-07-05T08:44:30Z 2012-07-05T08:44:30Z <p><a href="http://arxaliv.org/comments" rel="nofollow">http://arxaliv.org/comments</a> </p> <p><a href="http://arxaliv.org" rel="nofollow">http://arxaliv.org</a></p> <p>Ralph Furmaniak created a site based or reditt where people can leave comments and up-vote the arXiv papers. See discussions at </p> <p><a href="http://publishing.mathforge.org/discussion/83/frontend-to-the-arxiv-httparxalivorg-based-on-reddit/" rel="nofollow">http://publishing.mathforge.org/discussion/83/frontend-to-the-arxiv-httparxalivorg-based-on-reddit/</a></p> <p><a href="http://arxaliv.org/r/help/comments/12hd/welcome_to_arxaliv/is" rel="nofollow">http://arxaliv.org/r/help/comments/12hd/welcome_to_arxaliv/is</a></p> <p>I think this is great, unfortunately not so many contributors, let us contribute ? </p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51056/are-there-any-good-websites-for-hosting-discussions-of-mathematical-papers/101405#101405 Answer by David White for Are there any good websites for hosting discussions of mathematical papers? David White 2012-07-05T13:21:03Z 2012-07-05T13:21:03Z <p>It seems appropriate to mention Gowers's "Modest Proposal" from fall of 2011. Here is his <a href="http://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/10/31/how-might-we-get-to-a-new-model-of-mathematical-publishing/" rel="nofollow">original post</a>, and then his "<a href="http://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/11/03/a-more-modest-proposal/" rel="nofollow">more modest proposal</a>." This came about after the OP asked this question and seems very related, since a big benefit of his recommended mathoverflow-like system of submitting papers was the ability to have discussions of those papers. As others have pointed out, this also allows the community to quickly correct errors in the papers and also would reduce the lag-time between when new results are finished and when others can start to build on those results. I'm not sure what ever happened to Gowers's idea, except that there was a lot of discussion at the time and problems were pointed out. If someone knows, I hope he/she will edit this and fill in the details. This also seems related to Alex Chernov's recent answer; maybe Furmaniak's site was based on Gowers's ideas. I'm not really familiar with Reddit, so I don't know how similar it is to what Gowers envisioned. </p>