mertens-function in the light of divergent summation - what summation method were best adapted - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-24T17:22:06Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/47469http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/47469/mertens-function-in-the-light-of-divergent-summation-what-summation-method-weremertens-function in the light of divergent summation - what summation method were best adaptedGottfried Helms2010-11-26T23:15:54Z2012-01-28T22:21:40Z
<p>Just reading about the Mertens-function in the other thread
<a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/47436/is-there-an-elementary-proof-that-the-mertens-function-is-not-ox-theta-if" rel="nofollow">Mertens function</a> I remember an earlier attempt to apply divergent summation
to the series which is constructed of the Moebius-function
at consecutive arguments, or in other words of which the Mertens-function-values represent
the partial sums.</p>
<p>Eulersummation, although relatively poorly adapted, suggested that the (divergent) sum should be
meaningfully evaluated to <em>-2</em>. But that sequence of partial sums (although seldom exceeding only the squareroot of its current index) seems to be a specific difficult case for
such common summation methods - the approximation is relatively poor even for <em>128</em> terms.
I tried Nörlund-means/Cesaro-sum, Euler-sums of different orders and also a selfmade matrix summation-method using the eulerian numbers (with which I could -on the other hand- well handle the even strongly
diverging $ 0!-1!+2!-3!+...$ -series), but I tried not yet for instance Abel and Borel.</p>
<p>Q1: What method would be most appropriate to sum the series
$ S = \sum _{k=1}^{\inf} moebius(k) $ </p>
<p>Evaluation of <em>128</em> terms (Euler,Cesaro) suggested the result $S = -2$</p>
<p>Q2: And how could it be determined whether the Cesaro- and/or Euler-summation are at all capable to evaluate
that series to a final value?</p>
<p>Here is <a href="http://go.helms-net.de/math/images/mertenssum.png" rel="nofollow">a plot</a> of the summation.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/47469/mertens-function-in-the-light-of-divergent-summation-what-summation-method-were/47489#47489Answer by Robin Chapman for mertens-function in the light of divergent summation - what summation method were best adaptedRobin Chapman2010-11-27T08:13:02Z2010-11-27T08:13:02Z<p>Well,
$$\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{\mu(n)}{n^s}=\frac1{\zeta(s)}$$
for $s>1$, so setting $s=0$ should give
$$\sum_{n=1}^\infty\mu(n)=\frac1{\zeta(0)}=-2$$
as $\zeta(0)=-1/2$. :-)</p>
<p>I should add that this is a trick often used in analytic
number theory (for instance in Eisenstein series). More generally
given a divergent sum
$$S=\sum_{i\in I}a_i$$
then consider, for an appropriate choice of weights $b_i>0$
the series
$$f(s)=\sum_{i\in I}\frac{a_i}{b_i^s}.$$
We hope this converges in a suitable half-plane
and can be analytically continued to $0$. Then we "define"
$S=f(0)$.</p>