Is there an elementary proof that the Mertens function is not $O(x^\theta)$ if $\theta <1/2$? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-22T09:51:46Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/47436http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/47436/is-there-an-elementary-proof-that-the-mertens-function-is-not-ox-theta-ifIs there an elementary proof that the Mertens function is not $O(x^\theta)$ if $\theta <1/2$?Alastair Irving2010-11-26T15:24:15Z2010-11-26T18:47:53Z
<p>The Mertens function is the partial sums of the Moebius function:
$M(x)=\sum_{n\leq x}\mu(n)$
Since the zeta-function has a zero on the critical line it follows that $M(x)\ne O(x^\theta)$ for any $\theta<\frac 12$. </p>
<p>Does anyone know if there is an elementary proof of this statement? (By elementary I mean a proof which does not depend on complex analysis, in particular the existance of a zero of $\zeta$). even an elementary proof of $M(x)$ being unbounded would be interesting to me.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/47436/is-there-an-elementary-proof-that-the-mertens-function-is-not-ox-theta-if/47449#47449Answer by engelbrekt for Is there an elementary proof that the Mertens function is not $O(x^\theta)$ if $\theta <1/2$?engelbrekt2010-11-26T18:47:53Z2010-11-26T18:47:53Z<p>As far as I know, even an elementary proof that $M(x)$ is unbounded is not known.</p>