Sasaki but not Einstein - MathOverflow
most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net
2013-05-24T23:20:32Z
http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/46636
http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/46636/sasaki-but-not-einstein
Sasaki but not Einstein
Differentialgeometer
2010-11-19T15:18:44Z
2011-04-05T20:03:39Z
<p>Hi,
I search for an example of a Sasaki-manifold which is not Einstein.
Can you give one?</p>
<p>Thank you and best regards!</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/46636/sasaki-but-not-einstein/46639#46639
Answer by Anirbit for Sasaki but not Einstein
Anirbit
2010-11-19T15:26:21Z
2010-11-19T15:26:21Z
<p>I am not very sure of everything here but I wonder if the example given in Appendix A on Page 21 of <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0211063" rel="nofollow">this paper</a> by one of my professors meets your criteria. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/46636/sasaki-but-not-einstein/46664#46664
Answer by José Figueroa-O'Farrill for Sasaki but not Einstein
José Figueroa-O'Farrill
2010-11-19T18:26:58Z
2010-11-19T18:26:58Z
<p>Chapter 11 in Boyer-Galicki's <em>Sasakian Geometry</em> discusses two obstructions to the existence of Sasaki-Einstein structures on Sasakian manifolds. They go on to discuss many such examples, obtained as links of conical singularities of projective varieties in weighted projective spaces.</p>
<p>They are not hard to find! The cone of a Sasakian manifold is Kähler, whereas the cone of a Sasaki-Einstein manifold is Calabi-Yau. Hence your question is the analogue of asking for a Kähler manifold which is not Calabi-Yau. This is the generic situation.</p>
<p>As in my answer to your first question on Sasakian Geometry, there is no excuse for these questions given the wealth of information and the clarity of style of the book by Boyer and Galicki.</p>
<p>Go read the book! It really <em>is</em> good.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/46636/sasaki-but-not-einstein/60733#60733
Answer by Tarun Chitra for Sasaki but not Einstein
Tarun Chitra
2011-04-05T20:03:39Z
2011-04-05T20:03:39Z
<p>This is not an answer to your question, but rather an extension of José Figueroa-O'Farrill's answer. Roughly a year ago, a quick Google search led me to a preprint of Boyer & Galicki's wonderful book; it can be found <a href="http://www.mathematik.uni-marburg.de/~ltacg/ia/dateien/boyer&galicki-book.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>