Monotone functions are differentiable a.e. and Hilbert's Fifth Problem: what's the connection? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-26T03:25:18Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/44468http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/44468/monotone-functions-are-differentiable-a-e-and-hilberts-fifth-problem-whats-thMonotone functions are differentiable a.e. and Hilbert's Fifth Problem: what's the connection? Todd Trimble2010-11-01T18:26:42Z2010-11-01T19:13:15Z
<p>In Andrew Gleason's interview for More Mathematical People, there is the following exchange concerning Gleason's work on Hilbert's fifth problem on whether every locally Euclidean topological group is a Lie group (page 92). </p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>MP:</strong> Is there some "human" story you can tell us about the breakthrough when it came? </p>
<p><strong>Gleason:</strong> Yes, there's a really remarkable story about that. Sometime -- I can't tell you the exact date but let's say around 1949 -- I was doing other things too, and one of the things that I found very interesting and very curious and which I really felt I should try to understand better was a very famous theorem to the effect that a monotonic function is almost everywhere differentiable. It's a rather remarkable and very difficult theorem -- it's not easy to prove. A very very hard theorem of analysis and a really surprising theorem. Well, at the time I was sort of speculating about this theorem, but it wasn't for at least two years that I suddenly realized that <i>that</i> would solve the problem I was dealing with! Knowing that, in connection with some other stuff I had been working on, really put the whole thing together. It was a realization that although this theorem had been on my mind for maybe two years, I had never recognized that it was crucial to the arguments that I was trying to work through in the Hilbert problem. I hadn't realized it. Then suddenly it just came to me. </p>
<p><strong>MP:</strong> It just came to you? </p>
<p><strong>Gleason:</strong> That's right. It just came to me that I could use this technique, this theorem, in connection with these curves in Hilbert space that I was dealing with -- and get the answer! ... </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I've never studied Hilbert's Fifth Problem or its solutions, but I've always been curious what Gleason meant by this connection. Can anyone shed some light on this? </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/44468/monotone-functions-are-differentiable-a-e-and-hilberts-fifth-problem-whats-th/44473#44473Answer by Dick Palais for Monotone functions are differentiable a.e. and Hilbert's Fifth Problem: what's the connection? Dick Palais2010-11-01T19:13:15Z2010-11-01T19:13:15Z<p>Well, I cannot say for certain, but I did know Gleason well (he was my thesis advisor, and we wrote a paper together after that) and I have written an essay about Gleason's work on the Fifth Problem (in the Gleason Memorial article in the AMS Notices --- <a href="http://www.ams.org/notices/200910/rtx091001236p.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ams.org/notices/200910/rtx091001236p.pdf</a> ) and based on that I think I can make a reasonable guess about what he had in mind. Recall that what Gleason actually proved was that a locally compact group without arbitrarily small subgroups is a Lie group (then Montomery and Zippin proved that a locally Euclidean group did not have small subgroups). A key idea in Gleason's proof was the construction of a unique one-parameter subgroup through any point sufficiently close to the identity (i.e., essentially, constructing the exponential map) and this in turn depended on showing the existence of a unique square root for elements near the identity (see his paper "Square roots in locally Euclidean groups"). I believe that it is the step going from square roots to one-parameter subgroups that used ideas from the monotonic implies differentiable a.e. theorem. The "these curves" that he mentions in that More Mathematical People article, can only be the one-parameter subgroups. For more details, see my Notices article above, particularly the section called "Following in Gleason’s Footsteps". </p>