Trace space and Neumann boundary condition - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-22T08:20:43Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/41427http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/41427/trace-space-and-neumann-boundary-conditionTrace space and Neumann boundary condition Mircea2010-10-07T16:14:04Z2010-10-08T06:52:27Z
<p>In which sense is it possible to solve $\Delta u=0$, $\partial_\nu u=\phi$, for $\int\phi=0$ on a closed domain, say a ball $B^3\subset\mathbb R^3$? </p>
<p>For example would a $\phi\in L^p(\partial B^3)$, $1< p<2$ make sense? </p>
<p>In other words, is $W^{1,p}$ really the right trace space, or else, which is? </p>
<p>Where can I find this kind of results?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/41427/trace-space-and-neumann-boundary-condition/41432#41432Answer by Andrey Rekalo for Trace space and Neumann boundary condition Andrey Rekalo2010-10-07T17:05:31Z2010-10-07T17:05:31Z<p>If you are interested in $L^p$-theory, you are probably looking for solutions belonging to a Sobolev class $H^{s,p}(\Omega)$ with some $s>0$ and $p>1$. In this case, the Besov space
$B^{s-1-1/p,p}(\partial\Omega)$ is the "right" trace space. In particular, the restriction map
$$\rho: H^{s,p}(\Omega)\to B^{s-1-1/p,p}(\partial\Omega)$$
$$u\mapsto \partial_{\nu} u$$
is well defined for all $s>1+1/p$ and is surjective.</p>
<p>As for the Neumann problem, the following result is true</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Theorem.</strong> Let $s>1+1/p$ where $1< p< \infty$. Then the Neumann problem
$$\begin{cases} \triangle u=f & \mbox{in }\Omega,\\ \partial_{\nu} u=\phi & \mbox{on }\partial\Omega\end{cases}$$
has a unique solution $u$ in the space $H^{s,p}(\Omega)$ for any $f\in H^{s-2,p}(\Omega)$ and any $\phi\in B^{s-1-1/p,p}(\Omega)$.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Have a look at the very accessible <a href="http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=e3D0-onLFd0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=Analytic+Semigroups+and+Semilinear+Initial+Boundary+Value+Problems&source=bl&ots=15BPHCo8LC&sig=pygm9idqBG7ylZgQDAAXCDbcXjg&hl=en&ei=R_2tTIDTGISdOoWI2b8F&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBUQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false" rel="nofollow">exposition</a> by Kazuaki Taira.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/41427/trace-space-and-neumann-boundary-condition/41487#41487Answer by Denis Serre for Trace space and Neumann boundary condition Denis Serre2010-10-08T06:52:27Z2010-10-08T06:52:27Z<p>You can solve the problem with even less regularity than in Rekalo's answer. If $u\in W^{1,p}(\Omega)$, it does not have a normal trace in general. But if you assume in addition that $\Delta u\in L^p(\Omega)$, then the normal trace is well-defined and belongs to $W^{-1/p',p}(\partial\Omega)$, where $p'$ is the conjugate exponent. This space is of negative order, thus is not contained in any $L^q$. It is defined as the dual space of $W^{1/p',p'}(\partial\Omega)$. Since the latter contains the function ${\bf 1}$, it makes sense to say that the integral of $\phi$ is zero: just write $\langle\phi,{\bf 1}\rangle=0$. Under this condition, the Neumann boundary value problem admits a solution, unique up to an additive constant.</p>