Does every finitely generated group have a maximal normal subgroup? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-24T02:54:54Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/4086http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/4086/does-every-finitely-generated-group-have-a-maximal-normal-subgroupDoes every finitely generated group have a maximal normal subgroup?arun s2009-11-04T14:16:16Z2010-05-17T00:42:02Z
<p>Given an infinite group which is finitely generated, is there a proper maximal normal subgroup?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/4086/does-every-finitely-generated-group-have-a-maximal-normal-subgroup/4090#4090Answer by Gabe Cunningham for Does every finitely generated group have a maximal normal subgroup?Gabe Cunningham2009-11-04T14:39:47Z2009-11-04T14:39:47Z<p>Assuming you mean "does a maximal normal subgroup always exist?" (and that you don't care about computing it), here is a way to restate the problem. Notice that if G has no maximal normal subgroups, that means that every proper normal subgroup H of G is contained in a larger proper normal subgroup K of G. In particular, this means that the group G/H must not be finite; if it were, we could only find a finite chain of normal subgroups between H and G. So the question "does a maximal normal subgroup always exist" is the same as "must a finitely generated group have any finite nontrivial quotients?" I'm not sure what the answer to that is, but it seems like a useful restatement.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/4086/does-every-finitely-generated-group-have-a-maximal-normal-subgroup/4091#4091Answer by Richard Kent for Does every finitely generated group have a maximal normal subgroup?Richard Kent2009-11-04T14:40:54Z2009-11-04T16:04:01Z<p>If you mean nontrivial maximal normal subgroup (not 1 or the whole group), then the answer is no.</p>
<p>Higman constructed a finitely generated infinite group G with no subgroups of finite index. You then get a finitely generated group with no nontrivial normal subgroups by taking the quotient by a maximal normal subgroup.</p>
<p>Higman's group G is < a,b,c,d | a^-1 b a = b^2, b^-1cb = c^2, c^-1dc=d^2, d^-1ad=a^2 ></p>
<p>See Higman, Graham. A finitely generated infinite simple group. J. London Math. Soc. 26, (1951). 61--64. </p>
<p>Edit:</p>
<p>If you mean does it have a proper maximal normal subgroup, then the answer is yes:</p>
<p>Finitely generated groups have a (possibly trivial) maximal normal subgroup. Higman's reference for this is B.H. Neumann, "<a href="http://jlms.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/s1-12/2/120" rel="nofollow">Some remarks on infinite groups</a> ", Journal London Math. Soc, 12 (1937), 120-127.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/4086/does-every-finitely-generated-group-have-a-maximal-normal-subgroup/4095#4095Answer by Sonia Balagopalan for Does every finitely generated group have a maximal normal subgroup?Sonia Balagopalan2009-11-04T14:49:32Z2009-11-04T14:49:32Z<p>Check out the <a href="http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/TarskiMonster.html" rel="nofollow">Tarski monster</a>. It is 2-generated and simple.<br/>
Unless I misunderstood your question and you exclude infinite simple groups altogether. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/4086/does-every-finitely-generated-group-have-a-maximal-normal-subgroup/4194#4194Answer by yeshengkui for Does every finitely generated group have a maximal normal subgroup?yeshengkui2009-11-05T02:32:55Z2009-11-05T02:32:55Z<p>So many answers! I'm comletely lost. The paper of "B.H. Neumann, "Some remarks on infinite groups ", Journal London Math. Soc, 12 (1937), 120-127" stated results for the existence of maximal subgroups, not maximal normal subgroup. Is this existence question of nontrivial normal subgroup still unsolved?</p>