Easy special cases of the decomposition theorem? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-24T00:07:56Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/37593http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/37593/easy-special-cases-of-the-decomposition-theoremEasy special cases of the decomposition theorem?Jan Weidner2010-09-03T10:06:54Z2010-09-10T11:18:02Z
<p>The decomposition theorem states roughly, that the pushforward of an IC complex,
along a proper map decomposes into a direct sum of shifted IC complexes.</p>
<p>Are there special cases for the decomposition theorem, with "easy" proofs?</p>
<p>Are there heuristics, why the decomposition theorem should hold?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/37593/easy-special-cases-of-the-decomposition-theorem/37604#37604Answer by Donu Arapura for Easy special cases of the decomposition theorem?Donu Arapura2010-09-03T11:48:02Z2010-09-10T11:18:02Z<p>Well, it depends on what you mean by "easy". A special case, which I find very instructive, is a theorem of Deligne from the late 1960's. </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Theorem. <code>$\mathbb{R} f_*\mathbb{Q}\cong \bigoplus_i R^if_*\mathbb{Q}[-i]$</code>, when $f:X\to Y$ is a smooth projective morphism of varieties over $\mathbb{C}$. (This holds more generally with $\mathbb{Q}_\ell$-coefficients.)</p>
<p>Corollary. The Leray spectral sequence degenerates.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The result was deduced from the hard Lefschetz theorem.
An outline of a proof (of the corollary) can be found in Griffiths and Harris.
It is tricky but essentially elementary. </p>
<p>A much less elementary, but more conceptual argument, uses
weights. Say $Y$ is smooth and projective, then
$E_2^{pq}=H^p(Y, R^qf_*\mathbb{Q})$ <em>should</em> be pure of weight $p+q$ (in the sense of Hodge
theory or $\ell$-adic cohomology). Since
$$d_2: E_2^{pq}\to E_2^{p+2,q-1}$$
maps a structure of one weight to another it must vanish. Similarly for higher differentials. </p>
<p>If $f$ is proper but not smooth, the decomposition theorem shows that $\mathbb{R} f_*\mathbb{Q}$ decomposes into sum of translates of intersection cohomology complexes.
This follows from more sophisticated purity arguments (either in the $\ell$-adic setting as in BBD, or the Hodge theoretic setting in Saito's work).
There is also a newer proof due to de Cataldo and Migliorini which seems a bit more geometric. </p>
<p>I have been working through some of this stuff slowly. So I may have more to say in a few months time. Rather than updating this post, it may be more efficient for the people
interested to check
<a href="http://www.math.purdue.edu/~dvb/seminar.html" rel="nofollow"> here </a> periodically.</p>