Congruence Subgroups as Open Subgroups of the Modular Group Under the Right Topology - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-23T15:41:22Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/36777http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/36777/congruence-subgroups-as-open-subgroups-of-the-modular-group-under-the-right-topolCongruence Subgroups as Open Subgroups of the Modular Group Under the Right TopologyDavid Corwin2010-08-26T16:36:52Z2012-04-02T16:08:19Z
<p>It occurred to me that a subgroup of the modular group $\Gamma$ is a congruence subgroup iff it contains a subgroup of the form $\Gamma(N)$, while a subgroup of a general topological group is open iff it contains an open subgroup. This suggests making a topology on the modular group $\Gamma$ with the subgroups $\Gamma(N)$ as a basis of open neighborhoods of the origin so that $\Gamma$ becomes a topological group. It would then follow that a subgroup of $\Gamma$ is a congruence subgroup iff it is open.</p>
<p>Furthermore, for any $\gamma \in \Gamma$ not equal to the identity, there exists $N$ such that $\gamma \notin \Gamma(N)$, so this topology is Hausdorff, even totally disconnected.</p>
<p>I was inspired in part by <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/20929/distinguishing-congruence-subgroups-of-the-modular-group" rel="nofollow">this thread</a> and looked at <a href="http://www.ams.org/journals/proc/1996-124-05/S0002-9939-96-03496-X/S0002-9939-96-03496-X.pdf" rel="nofollow">this paper</a> but could not find anything about this idea.</p>
<p>Has anyone considered this topology? Does it provide insight into the problem of determining whether a group is a congruence subgroup?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/36777/congruence-subgroups-as-open-subgroups-of-the-modular-group-under-the-right-topol/36781#36781Answer by HW for Congruence Subgroups as Open Subgroups of the Modular Group Under the Right TopologyHW2010-08-26T16:53:35Z2010-08-26T17:03:21Z<p>It's called the congruence topology, and is (obviously) always at least as coarse as the profinite topology. If your group has the Congruence Subgroup Property (the modular group doesn't, but $SL_n(\mathbb{Z})$ does for $n>2$) then it's the same as the profinite topology.</p>
<p>A google search found, for instance, <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=1D6crOEoRFEC&pg=PA200&lpg=PA200&dq=congruence+topology&source=bl&ots=d-mel58Uo0&sig=Lxim14zcfsKZdMxgO2gU9otjPGY&hl=en&ei=TZx2TN3sGIW-sQPjktCgDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=11&ved=0CFEQ6AEwCg#v=onepage&q=congruence%2520topology&f=false" rel="nofollow">Section 7.3</a> of <em>Algebraic theory of the Bianchi groups</em> by Benjamin Fine.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/36777/congruence-subgroups-as-open-subgroups-of-the-modular-group-under-the-right-topol/36782#36782Answer by Jim Humphreys for Congruence Subgroups as Open Subgroups of the Modular Group Under the Right TopologyJim Humphreys2010-08-26T17:06:27Z2010-08-26T17:12:06Z<p>To expand Henry Wilton's concise answer, the Congruence Subgroup Problem has a distinguished history including important work by Serre and a number of others (exploiting effectively the congruence topology). See for example:
MR0272790 (42 #7671) 14.50,
Serre, Jean-Pierre,
Le probl`eme des groupes de congruence pour SL2. (French)
Ann. of Math. (2) 92 1970 489–527. </p>
<p>This sort of topology on a group originates earlier, but the application here is highly original. </p>
<p>ADDED: Like many other journal articles, the one mentioned here by Serre is available in PDF format but only through JSTOR (or other library resource). There is a lot of literature, including my 1980 Springer Lecture Notes 789 <em>Arithmetic Groups</em> which cover some of the background as well as an expository account of Matsumoto's thesis. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/36777/congruence-subgroups-as-open-subgroups-of-the-modular-group-under-the-right-topol/91830#91830Answer by Marc Palm for Congruence Subgroups as Open Subgroups of the Modular Group Under the Right TopologyMarc Palm2012-03-21T15:47:57Z2012-04-02T16:08:19Z<p>You can take the profinite completion $\widehat{\mathbb{Z}} = \prod_p \mathbb{Z}_p$ of $\mathbb{Z}$, then open subgroups of $G( \widehat{\mathbb{Z}})$ correspond to congruence subgroups in $G(\mathbb{Z})$.</p>
<p>The identification is easy:</p>
<p>$$ \Gamma \; congruence \leftrightarrow K \; open$$</p>
<p>"$\rightarrow$": Assume you have a congruence subgroup $\Gamma \subset \Gamma(N)$, then we can consider
$$ \Gamma / \Gamma(N) \subset SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / N) = \prod\limits_{p^k || N} SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / p^k ).$$
Define $K = K(\Gamma)$ as the pullback of $\Gamma / \Gamma(N)$ along the surjection
<code>$$p: \prod\limits_{p} SL_2(\mathbb{Z}_p) \rightarrow \prod\limits_{p^k || N} SL_2(\mathbb{Z} / p^k )$$</code></p>
<p>"$\leftarrow$": Pick $\Gamma = K \cap SL_2(\mathbb{Q})$, where $SL_2( \mathbb{Q})$ is diagonal subgroup $\prod\limits_p SL_2(\mathbb{Q}_{p})$.</p>