a provable upper bound on the summation - MathOverflow [closed]most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-21T09:48:15Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/35487http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/35487/a-provable-upper-bound-on-the-summationa provable upper bound on the summationManan2010-08-13T12:25:36Z2010-08-14T11:16:16Z
<p>Given the following:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>an $(n \times z)$ matrix $A = {(a_1,a_2, ... ,a_n)}^{T}$ where $z \geq n$ and every $a_i$ is a $z$-dimensional row vector. </p></li>
<li><p>$a_i = [a_{i1} a_{i2} ... a_{iz}]$ where $a_{ij} \geq 0 \forall j$</p></li>
<li><p>$\sum_{i=1}^{z}a_{ri} = 1, \forall r \in ${$1,2,...,n$}. </p></li>
<li><p>$\sum_{i=1}^{z}|a_{pi} - a_{qi}| \leq \epsilon, \forall p,q$ where $\epsilon << 1$.</p></li>
</ul>
<p>Find a provable upper bound on:</p>
<ul>
<li>$\sum_{i,j=1}^{z}|(1/n)*\sum_{k=1}^{n}[a_{ki}.(a_{f(k)j} - a_{g(k)j})]|$ </li>
</ul>
<p>where f and g are permutations over the set {$1,2,...,n$} such that $f(i) \neq g(i) \forall i$.</p>
<p>I am expecting the bound to be $\epsilon^2$ but I have no idea how to prove it.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/35487/a-provable-upper-bound-on-the-summation/35513#35513Answer by Daniel Litt for a provable upper bound on the summationDaniel Litt2010-08-13T17:55:21Z2010-08-13T18:51:03Z<p>EDIT: My answer is wrong, though not for the reason given by the commenter; I read the absolute values as being inside the summation. </p>
<p>This is false. Consider the matrix <code>$$\begin{pmatrix}
\epsilon/2 & 0 \\
1-\epsilon/2 & 1
\end{pmatrix}.$$</code></p>
<p>Letting $f$ be the identity and $g$ the only other permutation, the sum is on the order of $\epsilon$, not $\epsilon^2$. Furthermore, rearranging sums easily gives $\epsilon$ as an upper bound in the general case, assuming the entries are all positive.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/35487/a-provable-upper-bound-on-the-summation/35573#35573Answer by Tsuyoshi Ito for a provable upper bound on the summationTsuyoshi Ito2010-08-14T11:16:16Z2010-08-14T11:16:16Z<p>Here is a copy-and-paste of the <a href="http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2250/a-provable-upper-bound-on-the-summation/2380#2380" rel="nofollow">answer</a> I posted to the same question on math.stackexchange.com so that the questioner can close this question.</p>
<p>The sum in question is at most ε<sup>2</sup>. (We do not need the condition that the row sum equals 1 or the condition f(i)≠g(i) to obtain this.)</p>
<p><strong>Proof</strong>. Since
$$\sum_{k=1}^n(a_{f(k)j}-a_{g(k)j})=\sum_{k=1}^na_{f(k)j}-\sum_{k=1}^na_{g(k)j}=0,$$
we have
$$\left|\sum_{k=1}^na_{ki}(a_{f(k)j}-a_{g(k)j})\right|
=\left|\sum_{k=1}^n(a_{ki}-a_{1i})(a_{f(k)j}-a_{g(k)j})\right|$$
$$\le\sum_{k=1}^n|a_{ki}-a_{1i}||a_{f(k)j}-a_{g(k)j}|.$$
Therefore, the sum in question is at most
$$\frac1n\sum_{i,j=1}^z\sum_{k=1}^n|a_{ki}-a_{1i}||a_{f(k)j}-a_{g(k)j}|
=\frac1n\sum_{k=1}^n\left(\sum_{i=1}^z|a_{ki}-a_{1i}|\right)\left(\sum_{j=1}^z|a_{f(k)j}-a_{g(k)j}|\right)$$
$$\le\frac1n\sum_{k=1}^n\epsilon^2=\epsilon^2.$$</p>