The best text to study both incompleteness theorems - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-19T00:16:51Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/34099http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/34099/the-best-text-to-study-both-incompleteness-theoremsThe best text to study both incompleteness theoremsSergei Tropanets2010-08-01T10:59:23Z2012-07-17T21:28:19Z
<p>Hi! </p>
<p>What text on both incompleteness theorems you would recommend for beginner?
Specifically, I'm looking for the text with the following properties:</p>
<p>1) The proofs should be finitistic, in Godel's tradition, i. e. formalizing "I'm unprovable" (not, for instance, via formalization of halting problem);</p>
<p>2) The text must be of reasonable length but with complete proofs, so that one can study them in a reasonable amount of time (e. g. only those forms of recursion theory theorems are proved which are precisely needed for incompleteness proofs);</p>
<p>3) The entire text should be motivated and discussing ideas (even those of philosophical character) before and between technical constructions. </p>
<p>I would be very thankful if you'll equip your suggestion with some short resume.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/34099/the-best-text-to-study-both-incompleteness-theorems/34102#34102Answer by Antonio E. Porreca for The best text to study both incompleteness theoremsAntonio E. Porreca2010-08-01T11:29:47Z2010-08-01T11:29:47Z<p>Speaking as a beginner myself:</p>
<p>I haven’t read it all yet, but <a href="http://www.logicmatters.net/igt/" rel="nofollow">An Introduction to Gödel’s Theorems</a> by Peter Smith seems like a good candidate, and it doesn’t have many prerequisites. Smith also wrote a series of shorter handouts on the topic, <a href="http://www.logicmatters.net/igt/godel-without-tears/" rel="nofollow">Gödel Without (Too Many) Tears</a>.</p>
<p>There’s also <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Godels-Theorem-Incomplete-Guide-Abuse/dp/1568812388/" rel="nofollow">Godel’s Theorem: An Incomplete Guide to Its Use and Abuse</a> by Torkel Franzén, which is much less technical and primarily concerns false myths about the incompleteness theorems; in my opinion, it is a good companion (not a substitute) for Smith’s book.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/34099/the-best-text-to-study-both-incompleteness-theorems/34103#34103Answer by Pete L. Clark for The best text to study both incompleteness theoremsPete L. Clark2010-08-01T11:31:05Z2010-08-01T11:31:05Z<p>For instance, there is a well-regarded recent book of Torkel Franzen:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Gödel’sTheorem: An Incomplete Guide to Its Use and Abuse</p>
</blockquote>
<p>A detailed and positive review was given by Panu Raatikainen in the Notices of the AMS:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/praatika/rev-raatikainen.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/praatika/rev-raatikainen.pdf</a></p>
<p>Honestly, your question seems underdetermined, since there are many other well-regarded books that an internet search will reveal to you. I would suggest just picking one and trying it out. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/34099/the-best-text-to-study-both-incompleteness-theorems/34121#34121Answer by Brendan Cordy for The best text to study both incompleteness theoremsBrendan Cordy2010-08-01T15:42:35Z2010-08-01T15:42:35Z<p>Peter Smith's book is great. It's very readable and contains all the details. The problem is that it doesn't leave anything for you to do! If you want to get your hands dirty and work a few things out for yourself, I'd recommend Raymond Smullyan's book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Godels-Incompleteness-Theorems-Oxford-Guides/dp/0195046722/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1280676775&sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">Godel's Incompleteness Theorems</a>. It's a bit terse, but very clear and complete, more like what one would expect of a traditional mathematics text. Most importantly, it contains some very well selected exercises at the end of each chapter.</p>
<p>Edit: It costs a fortune on amazon, but if you look around discount places like abebooks you can find it for a fraction of that price.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/34099/the-best-text-to-study-both-incompleteness-theorems/34136#34136Answer by Andrew L for The best text to study both incompleteness theoremsAndrew L2010-08-01T18:54:38Z2010-08-01T18:54:38Z<p>My favorite text on mathematical logic <em>period</em> is Wolf's <em>A Tour Through Mathematical Logic</em>. There's a terrific chapter in there on the Godel Theorums with historical and philosophical notes. That's where I'd begin. </p>
<p>For a more mathematically rigorous presentation, the classic <em>An Introduction To Mathematical Logic</em> by my old teacher Elliott Mendelson is still very hard to beat for clarity and depth. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/34099/the-best-text-to-study-both-incompleteness-theorems/34163#34163Answer by Kaveh for The best text to study both incompleteness theoremsKaveh2010-08-01T22:43:57Z2010-08-05T13:03:35Z<p>First chapter of Jean-Yves Girard, "Proof Theory and Logical Complexity", Vol I, Bibliopolis, 1987</p>
<p>It satisfies all of your conditions, but it is not an elementary book. If I remember correctly, the authors (A.S. Troelstra and H. Schwichtenberg) of the book "Basic Proof Theory" which is published in 2001 wrote in their introduction that their intention was to fill the gap between this and all other (introductionary) books in proof theory. As far as I know, he never published the second volume.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/34099/the-best-text-to-study-both-incompleteness-theorems/34626#34626Answer by Noah S for The best text to study both incompleteness theoremsNoah S2010-08-05T13:27:01Z2010-08-05T13:27:01Z<p>It's not a book, and it's not perfectly formal, but it's short (8 pages), eminently readable, and the best source of intuition about Goedel's Theorem (and related results) that I've yet found: "An Informal Exposition of Proofs of Godel's Theorems and Church's Theorem" by J. Barkley Rosser. Basically the only things this paper omits are the coding apparatus used to show that "$x$ is the Godel number of a provable sentence," and other similar sentences, are expressible; and Rosser's Trick, which reduces the number of assumptions required for Godel's Theorem to hold. Personally, I find this first omission to be justified: the coding apparatus is much easier to understand after one has seen the rest of the proof. The latter omission is kind of annoying, since Rosser's Trick is so pretty, but c'est la vie. Barring these omissions, however, Rosser's paper is basically entirely rigorous.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/34099/the-best-text-to-study-both-incompleteness-theorems/34636#34636Answer by Bruno Stonek for The best text to study both incompleteness theoremsBruno Stonek2010-08-05T14:49:51Z2010-08-05T14:49:51Z<p>If you can read Spanish, an excellent text which both formally proves and philosophically treats both Incompleteness theorems is Carlos Ivorra Castillo's "Lógica y teoría de conjuntos" which is freely available on-line:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uv.es/ivorra/Libros/Logica.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.uv.es/ivorra/Libros/Logica.pdf</a></p>
<p>It treats as little recursion theory as it is needed to prove the results on logic.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/34099/the-best-text-to-study-both-incompleteness-theorems/50306#50306Answer by Eran for The best text to study both incompleteness theoremsEran2010-12-24T21:30:35Z2010-12-24T21:30:35Z<p>The most accurate text (even for beginners) in my opinion is C. Smorynski's paper in the Handbook of Mathematical Logic - "The incompleteness theorems". I think it answers all your three requirements.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/34099/the-best-text-to-study-both-incompleteness-theorems/83489#83489Answer by Zeeshan Mahmud for The best text to study both incompleteness theoremsZeeshan Mahmud2011-12-15T01:53:58Z2011-12-15T01:53:58Z<p>For absolute beginner, I highly recommend <em>Gödel’s Proof</em> (Ernest Nagel with J. R. Newman, 1958). It can be supplemented with the ever popular <em>Gödel, Escher, Bach</em> by Douglas Hofstadter (1980) and <em>I Am A Strange Loop</em> by the same author. It would also benefit to study his biography <em>Gödel: A Life of Logic</em> by John L. Casti and Werner DePauli (2000) as well as the classic <em>Forever Undecided</em> by Raymond Smullyan.For serious study <em>Gödel's Theorem in Focus</em> by S.G.Shanker can serve as a stepping stone. And finally, why not - to borrow Abel- "study the master" himself from his <em>Nachlass</em>?</p>
<p>[Rudy Rucker in <em>Infinity and the Mind</em> discusses his meeting with Gödel as well as the logician's mysticism.]</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/34099/the-best-text-to-study-both-incompleteness-theorems/102491#102491Answer by Dave for The best text to study both incompleteness theoremsDave2012-07-17T21:28:19Z2012-07-17T21:28:19Z<p>Stephan Bilaniuk's: "A problem Course in Mathematical Logic". The only source I've found that satisfies all your requirements. And it's free.</p>