Does the space of n x n, positive-definite, self-adjoint, real matrices have a better name? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-19T18:59:51Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/332http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/332/does-the-space-of-n-x-n-positive-definite-self-adjoint-real-matrices-have-a-beDoes the space of n x n, positive-definite, self-adjoint, real matrices have a better name?Tom LaGatta2009-10-12T01:13:49Z2012-05-25T19:05:45Z
<p>This is also the space of real, symmetric bilinear forms in R^n.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/332/does-the-space-of-n-x-n-positive-definite-self-adjoint-real-matrices-have-a-be/333#333Answer by Scott Morrison for Does the space of n x n, positive-definite, self-adjoint, real matrices have a better name?Scott Morrison2009-10-12T01:45:24Z2009-10-12T01:45:24Z<p>For starters, since they're real I'd say symmetric instead of self-adjoint.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/332/does-the-space-of-n-x-n-positive-definite-self-adjoint-real-matrices-have-a-be/485#485Answer by Darsh Ranjan for Does the space of n x n, positive-definite, self-adjoint, real matrices have a better name?Darsh Ranjan2009-10-14T09:09:51Z2009-10-14T09:09:51Z<p>Two possible answers:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>Standard jargon is <b>SPD</b> (for "symmetric positive-definite"). </p></li>
<li><p>This isn't exactly a "name," but the n x n symmetric positive-definite matrices are exactly those matrices A such that the bilinear function (x, y) -> y<sup>T</sup>Ax defines an inner product on <b>R</b><sup>n</sup>. Conversely, every bilinear function is of that form for some A, so with some abuse of terminology, you could equate the set of those matrices with the set of inner products on <b>R</b><sup>n</sup>. </p></li>
</ul>
<p>There are many other ways to characterize SPD matrices, but that's the only one I can think of at the moment that can be summarized as a single noun phrase. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/332/does-the-space-of-n-x-n-positive-definite-self-adjoint-real-matrices-have-a-be/505#505Answer by Lior Silberman for Does the space of n x n, positive-definite, self-adjoint, real matrices have a better name?Lior Silberman2009-10-14T18:38:59Z2009-10-14T18:38:59Z<p>This is the symmetric space of GL_n(R)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/332/does-the-space-of-n-x-n-positive-definite-self-adjoint-real-matrices-have-a-be/2153#2153Answer by Mark Meckes for Does the space of n x n, positive-definite, self-adjoint, real matrices have a better name?Mark Meckes2009-10-23T19:15:45Z2009-10-23T19:15:45Z<p>Note that this space is not a vector space, but is a convex cone in the vector space of nxn matrices (it is closed under addition and multiplication by positive scalars). Hence people sometimes refer to the "positive semidefinite cone".</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/332/does-the-space-of-n-x-n-positive-definite-self-adjoint-real-matrices-have-a-be/4233#4233Answer by Jonas Meyer for Does the space of n x n, positive-definite, self-adjoint, real matrices have a better name?Jonas Meyer2009-11-05T09:10:54Z2009-11-05T09:10:54Z<p>How about <img src="http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?%24M%5Fn%28%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%29%5E%2B" alt="$M_n(\mathbb{R})^+" title="" />? I have seen <img src="http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?S%5E%2B" alt="S^+" title="" /> or <img src="http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?S%5F%2B" alt="S_+" title="" /> used to denote the set of positive linear transformations in a set <img src="http://latex.mathoverflow.net/png?S" alt="S" title="" /> of linear transformations on an inner product space, but this was in the context of operator algebras.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/332/does-the-space-of-n-x-n-positive-definite-self-adjoint-real-matrices-have-a-be/97975#97975Answer by Kjetil B Halvorsen for Does the space of n x n, positive-definite, self-adjoint, real matrices have a better name?Kjetil B Halvorsen2012-05-25T19:05:45Z2012-05-25T19:05:45Z<p>It is often usefull to know that this set can be identified with the set of non-singulat covariance matrices of random vectors with values in $\mathbb(R)^n$.</p>