Status of Beal, Granville, Tijdeman-Zagier Conjecture - MathOverflow [closed] most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-06-19T15:58:26Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/28764 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/28764/status-of-beal-granville-tijdeman-zagier-conjecture Status of Beal, Granville, Tijdeman-Zagier Conjecture Halfdan Faber 2010-06-19T17:06:37Z 2013-06-17T18:29:29Z <p>The Beal, Granville, Tijdeman-Zagier Conjecture, i.e.</p> <p>If $A^x+B^y=C^z$ , where $A, B, C, x, y,z$ are positive integers and $x, y$ and $z$ are all greater than $2$, then $A, B$ and $C$ must have a common prime factor.</p> <p>... and its associated <a href="http://ns3.ams.org/bealprize.html" rel="nofollow">$1,000,000 prize</a> for proof or disproof seems to have gone largely unnoticed in the mathematics community. Please answer with (A) references to past or ongoing research or (B) references to equivalent forms of this conjecture known prior to Andrew Beal posing it in 1993.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/28764/status-of-beal-granville-tijdeman-zagier-conjecture/28767#28767 Answer by Robin Chapman for Status of Beal, Granville, Tijdeman-Zagier Conjecture Robin Chapman 2010-06-19T17:21:26Z 2010-06-19T17:21:26Z <p>There was a great deal of discussion in the sci.math newsgroup about a decade ago. See the threads <a href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/31cd9a6140a743f5/f3d6fc0644a98481?hl=en&amp;q=sci.math+beal%2527s+conjecture&amp;lnk=ol&amp;" rel="nofollow">Beal's Conjecture</a> and <a href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d8d2ad7d61a796e3/1755be7ffc2bfd5a?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=sci.math+beal%2527s+conjecture#1755be7ffc2bfd5a" rel="nofollow">Against the term "Beal Conjecture"</a>. As with most sci.math discussions, they generated more heat than light.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/28764/status-of-beal-granville-tijdeman-zagier-conjecture/31596#31596 Answer by Charles for Status of Beal, Granville, Tijdeman-Zagier Conjecture Charles 2010-07-12T18:26:15Z 2010-07-12T18:26:15Z <p>The sci.math discussions linked to above suggest that Andrew Granville suggested the problem in 1992 and that it was discussed as early as 1985.</p> <p>I have in my notes:</p> <p>T-Z predates Beal; see Frits Beukers, "The Diophantine equation $Ax^p+By^q=Cz^r$", <em>Duke Math. J.</em> <strong>91</strong>:1 (1998), pp. 61-88.</p> <p>This kind of informal documentation may be the best available, unfortunately.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/28764/status-of-beal-granville-tijdeman-zagier-conjecture/40949#40949 Answer by JSE for Status of Beal, Granville, Tijdeman-Zagier Conjecture JSE 2010-10-03T19:13:48Z 2010-10-03T19:13:48Z <p>At present there is no real strategy for the general problem. But progress on individual cases, or families of cases, keeps moving along. For instance, Poonen, Schaeffer, and Stoll <a href="http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/math/pdf/0508/0508174v1.pdf" rel="nofollow">handled the case x^2 + y^3 + z^7</a> in 2005; last year, Mike Bennett, Nathan Ng and I <a href="https://www.math.wisc.edu/~ellenber/BeElNgdraftFINAL.pdf" rel="nofollow">finished off the case x^2 + y^4 = x^p</a> and <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2932" rel="nofollow">David Brown did x^2 + y^3 + z^10</a>. </p>