Status of Beal, Granville, Tijdeman-Zagier Conjecture - MathOverflow [closed]most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T15:58:26Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/28764http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/28764/status-of-beal-granville-tijdeman-zagier-conjectureStatus of Beal, Granville, Tijdeman-Zagier ConjectureHalfdan Faber2010-06-19T17:06:37Z2013-06-17T18:29:29Z
<p>The Beal, Granville, Tijdeman-Zagier Conjecture, i.e.</p>
<p>If $A^x+B^y=C^z$ , where $A, B, C, x, y,z$ are positive integers and $x,
y$ and $z$ are all greater than $2$, then $A, B$ and $C$ must have a common prime
factor.</p>
<p>... and its associated <a href="http://ns3.ams.org/bealprize.html" rel="nofollow">$1,000,000 prize</a> for proof or disproof seems to have gone largely unnoticed in the mathematics community. Please answer with (A) references to past or ongoing research or (B) references to equivalent forms of this conjecture known prior to Andrew Beal posing it in 1993.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/28764/status-of-beal-granville-tijdeman-zagier-conjecture/28767#28767Answer by Robin Chapman for Status of Beal, Granville, Tijdeman-Zagier ConjectureRobin Chapman2010-06-19T17:21:26Z2010-06-19T17:21:26Z<p>There was a great deal of discussion in the sci.math newsgroup about a decade
ago. See the threads
<a href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/31cd9a6140a743f5/f3d6fc0644a98481?hl=en&q=sci.math+beal%2527s+conjecture&lnk=ol&" rel="nofollow">Beal's Conjecture</a> and <a href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d8d2ad7d61a796e3/1755be7ffc2bfd5a?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=sci.math+beal%2527s+conjecture#1755be7ffc2bfd5a" rel="nofollow">Against the term "Beal Conjecture"</a>.
As with most sci.math discussions, they generated more heat than light.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/28764/status-of-beal-granville-tijdeman-zagier-conjecture/31596#31596Answer by Charles for Status of Beal, Granville, Tijdeman-Zagier ConjectureCharles2010-07-12T18:26:15Z2010-07-12T18:26:15Z<p>The sci.math discussions linked to above suggest that Andrew Granville suggested the problem in 1992 and that it was discussed as early as 1985.</p>
<p>I have in my notes:</p>
<p>T-Z predates Beal; see Frits Beukers, "The Diophantine equation $Ax^p+By^q=Cz^r$", <em>Duke Math. J.</em> <strong>91</strong>:1 (1998), pp. 61-88.</p>
<p>This kind of informal documentation may be the best available, unfortunately.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/28764/status-of-beal-granville-tijdeman-zagier-conjecture/40949#40949Answer by JSE for Status of Beal, Granville, Tijdeman-Zagier ConjectureJSE2010-10-03T19:13:48Z2010-10-03T19:13:48Z<p>At present there is no real strategy for the general problem. But progress on individual cases, or families of cases, keeps moving along. For instance, Poonen, Schaeffer, and Stoll <a href="http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/math/pdf/0508/0508174v1.pdf" rel="nofollow">handled the case x^2 + y^3 + z^7</a> in 2005; last year, Mike Bennett, Nathan Ng and I <a href="https://www.math.wisc.edu/~ellenber/BeElNgdraftFINAL.pdf" rel="nofollow">finished off the case x^2 + y^4 = x^p</a> and <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2932" rel="nofollow">David Brown did x^2 + y^3 + z^10</a>. </p>