Combinatorics of signed oriented graphs/skew-symmetric matrices - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T01:02:11Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/28358http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/28358/combinatorics-of-signed-oriented-graphs-skew-symmetric-matricesCombinatorics of signed oriented graphs/skew-symmetric matricesWadim Zudilin2010-06-16T08:08:09Z2010-06-16T08:08:09Z
<p>Consider a "complete" <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signed_graph" rel="nofollow">signed graph</a> on $n$ vertices indexed by
$1,2,\dots,n$, that is, a graph in which any two distinct vertices $i$ and $j$ are connected by an oriented edge.
For each pair of vertices $i$ and $j$, write $v_{ij}=1$ or $-1$ depending on whether the connecting edge
goes from $i$ to $j$ or from $j$ to $i$, respectively, and $v_{ii}=0$. The corresponding
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjacency_matrix" rel="nofollow">adjacency matrix</a> $V=(v_{ij})_{1\le i,j\le n}$
is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skew-symmetric_matrix" rel="nofollow">skew-symmetric matrix</a> with entries
$\pm1$ only outside the main diagonal. In particular, its determinant is 0 for $n$ odd and nonnegative
for $n$ even; by a simple parity argument it can be shown that $\det(V)$ is odd (hence positive) in the latter case.
On the other hand, $\det(V)$ seems to assume all possible odd positive values restricted only by
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadamard%27s_inequality" rel="nofollow">Hadamard's_inequality</a>.</p>
<p>My general question is whether the condition $\det(V)=1$ imposes some known combinatorial structure
in the set of complete signed oriented graphs (or maybe in a reasonable subset of this set).
Some kind of related questions is whether the matrix $V$ in general imposes some interesting
combinatorial structure of the underlying graph (I even do not the answer in the case when $v_{ij}$
depends only on the distance $i-j$, that is, $v_{ij}=\epsilon_{i-j}$).</p>