What is the comultiplication of a matrix frobenius algebra? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-24T10:08:29Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/2802http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/2802/what-is-the-comultiplication-of-a-matrix-frobenius-algebraWhat is the comultiplication of a matrix frobenius algebra?Aleks Kissinger2009-10-27T11:41:43Z2009-10-31T23:38:07Z
<p>One of the easiest examples I can think of for frobenius algebras is a plain ol' matrix algebra with tr : V → k as the co-unit (or equivalently, tr(a⋅b) as the frobenius form). This is enough data to generate a comultiplication δ : V → V ⊗ V. This turns out to be μ<sup>†</sup>, for multiplication μ. Is there any intuition for what this map does (aside from the obvious "do multiplication on the dual space")?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2802/what-is-the-comultiplication-of-a-matrix-frobenius-algebra/2894#2894Answer by Theo Johnson-Freyd for What is the comultiplication of a matrix frobenius algebra?Theo Johnson-Freyd2009-10-27T20:59:56Z2009-10-31T23:38:07Z<p>Here's how I live to think about matrices. Penrose (1971) figured out that you can draw linear algebra diagrammatically. A picture in the Penrose notation is a directed labeled graph with external leaves. The edges are labeled by vector spaces (changing the direction on an edge has the same effect as swapping the label <i>X</i> with the dual vector space <i>X</i>*), and vertices by multilinear maps. In this way, placing two edges next to each other is the tensor product. The ground field <strong>R</strong> should be drawn as an invisible edge, so that <i>X</i> ⊗ <strong>R</strong> = <i>X</i>.</p>
<p>So, pick your favorite finite-dimensional vector space <i>X</i>, and think about the types of diagrams you can draw using just it. Well, the space of matrices (what you call <em>V</em>) is <i>X</i> ⊗ <i>X</i>*, so it looks like two parallel lines pointed in opposite directions. Then you can check that the trace is the directed cap, the identity element (thought of as a map <strong>R</strong> → <em>V</em>) is the directed cup, and multiplication and comultiplication are both given by trivalent vertices.</p>
<p>In ASCII (ignore the weird coloring):</p>
<pre><code> | | | |
| | | |
X = ^ , X* = v , R = [empty], V = ^ v
| | | |
| | | |
->- | |
/ \ ^ v
Tr = | | I = | |
^ v \ /
| | -<-
| | | | | |
^ v ^ v ^ v
| | | | | |
mu = / _ \ delta = \ \_/ /
/ / \ \ \ /
| | | | | |
^ v ^ v ^ v
| | | | | |
</code></pre>
<p>Not only does the notation "explain" the comultiplication, it "proves" all the associativity and unital properties you might want. Mostly, though, I think it makes it totally clear what the Frobenius pairing (a,b) → Tr(ab) is doing. It's just the map:</p>
<pre><code> ->-
/ _ \
pair = / / \ \
| | | |
^ v ^ v
| | | |
</code></pre>
<p>Which is just the canonical fact that (<i>X</i> ⊗ <i>X</i>*)* = <i>X</i> ⊗ <i>X</i>*. This ability to rotate <i>X</i> ⊗ <i>X</i>* is why δ = μ*.</p>