Proof of no rational point on Selmer's Curve 3x^3+4y^3+5z^3=0 - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-19T04:31:34Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/2779 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2779/proof-of-no-rational-point-on-selmers-curve-3x34y35z30 Proof of no rational point on Selmer's Curve 3x^3+4y^3+5z^3=0 Alon Amit 2009-10-27T05:40:48Z 2011-04-19T23:44:33Z <p>The projective curve $3x^3+4y^3+5z^3=0$ is often cited as an example (given by Selmer) of a <strong>failure of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasse%5Fprinciple" rel="nofollow">Hasse Principle</a></strong>: the equation has solutions in any completion of the rationals $\mathbb Q$, but not in $\mathbb Q$ itself. </p> <p>I don't think I've ever seen a proof of the latter claim &mdash; is someone able to provide an outline? What are the necessary tools?</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2779/proof-of-no-rational-point-on-selmers-curve-3x34y35z30/2782#2782 Answer by Thomas Riepe for Proof of no rational point on Selmer's Curve 3x^3+4y^3+5z^3=0 Thomas Riepe 2009-10-27T06:37:39Z 2009-10-27T06:37:39Z <p>I think I saw a proof of that in Cassel's "Diophantine Equations with special reference to elliptic curves" and in some surveys by Mazur in the Bull. AMS (perhaps <a href="http://math.stanford.edu/~lekheng/flt/mazur2.pdf" rel="nofollow" title="Mazur on local-global in NT">this</a>, but I have in the moment no time to look).</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2779/proof-of-no-rational-point-on-selmers-curve-3x34y35z30/2784#2784 Answer by David Lehavi for Proof of no rational point on Selmer's Curve 3x^3+4y^3+5z^3=0 David Lehavi 2009-10-27T07:01:23Z 2009-10-27T07:01:23Z <p>The "standard" technique for killing the Hasse priniciple for elliptic curves is to show that the Tate-Shafarevich group has a copy of (Z/mZ)^2 for some m - see chapter X in Silverman's the arithmetic of Eliptic curves, both for the theory and examples. All the examples which Silverman presents ar with m = 2. Selmers example requires m = 3, which requires (much) more computations. Poonen has an <a href="http://www-math.mit.edu/~poonen/papers/cubics.ps" rel="nofollow">example</a> on his web page of a family of elliptic curves violating the Hasse principle, and containing Selmers example, but you'd have to dive through a labirinth of references.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2779/proof-of-no-rational-point-on-selmers-curve-3x34y35z30/2785#2785 Answer by Ho Chung Siu for Proof of no rational point on Selmer's Curve 3x^3+4y^3+5z^3=0 Ho Chung Siu 2009-10-27T07:04:59Z 2011-04-19T23:44:33Z <p>My friend has written an introduction to algebraic number theory before, which contains a short proof of this statement, but I didn't check its validity.</p> <p>[Edit: Update the link of the document] <a href="http://www.2shared.com/document/2d6M7kNU/Introduction_to_Algebraic_Numb.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.2shared.com/document/2d6M7kNU/Introduction_to_Algebraic_Numb.html</a> p.41 of the document, or p.45 of the pdf.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2779/proof-of-no-rational-point-on-selmers-curve-3x34y35z30/6301#6301 Answer by Kevin Buzzard for Proof of no rational point on Selmer's Curve 3x^3+4y^3+5z^3=0 Kevin Buzzard 2009-11-20T18:59:13Z 2009-11-20T18:59:13Z <p>There's a proof in Cassels' little blue book on elliptic curves which the OP might find more to his taste than some others mentioned here.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2779/proof-of-no-rational-point-on-selmers-curve-3x34y35z30/11867#11867 Answer by KConrad for Proof of no rational point on Selmer's Curve 3x^3+4y^3+5z^3=0 KConrad 2010-01-15T14:39:06Z 2010-01-15T14:39:06Z <p>This problem is in Cassels' book "Local Fields" and I wrote up a solution once along those lines, for an algebraic number theory class. See </p> <p><a href="http://www.math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/blurbs/gradnumthy/selmerexample.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/blurbs/gradnumthy/selmerexample.pdf</a>,</p> <p>but I should advise that it comes out seeming pretty tedious. Solutions that involve elliptic curves are more conceptual. Others have already provided pointers to references for that approach.</p>