What is the universal property of associated graded? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-20T07:39:07Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/263http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/263/what-is-the-universal-property-of-associated-gradedWhat is the universal property of associated graded?Anton Geraschenko2009-10-10T20:09:51Z2009-10-12T04:36:25Z
<p>Given a filtered vector space (or module over a ring) 0=V<sub>0</sub>⊆V<sub>1</sub>⊆...⊆V, you can construct the <em>associated graded</em> vector space gr(V)=⊕<sub>i</sub>V<sub>i+1</sub>/V<sub>i</sub>. Does gr(V) satisfy a universal property? What is it?</p>
<p>Before anybody hastily says, "it's the universal graded vector space with a filtered map from V," let me point out that it's not so simple. A map of filtered vector spaces is a map of vector spaces which respects the filtration. It's clear what the map V<sub>i+1</sub>→V<sub>i+1</sub>/V<sub>i</sub> should be, but what would the map ∪V<sub>i</sub>→⊕<sub>i</sub>V<sub>i+1</sub>/V<sub>i</sub> be?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/263/what-is-the-universal-property-of-associated-graded/264#264Answer by Ben Webster for What is the universal property of associated graded?Ben Webster2009-10-10T20:25:18Z2009-10-11T04:02:36Z<p>The associated graded of a filtered R-module M is the universal R-module with a map of the Rees module of M over R[t] to gr M. </p>
<p>Let me explain what the Rees module Rees(M) is: it's the submodule of M[t,t<sup>-1</sup>] which is generated as a R[t] module by t<sup>i</sup>M_i. Give this the obvious grading by degree of t. So Rees(M)/tRees(M)=gr M, whereas Rees(M)/(t-1)Rees(M)=M with the induced filtration. This is the thing that has a map to gr M.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/263/what-is-the-universal-property-of-associated-graded/334#334Answer by Anton Geraschenko for What is the universal property of associated graded?Anton Geraschenko2009-10-12T03:33:33Z2009-10-12T04:36:25Z<p>A universal property comes from an adjunction. From this point of view, associated graded has no universal property because it is not left or right adjoint.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Proof. If gr(-) were left (right)
adjoint, then it would respect
cokernels (kernels). Consider the
morphism of filtered vector spaces
(0⊆0⊆V)→(0⊆V⊆V)
(the three pieces are the 0-, 1-, and
2-filtered parts) which is just the
identity map on V. It's kernel and
cokernel are trivial. But the induced
map
gr(0⊆0⊆V)→gr(0⊆V⊆V)
is the zero map from V (in degree 2)
to V (in degree 1), which has
non-trivial kernel and cokernel. So
the associated graded of the
(co)kernel is not the (co)kernel of
the associated graded map.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ben's solution is to write this poorly behaved functor as a composition of two nicer functors. The first functor is Rees:R-filmod→R[t]-grmod (from the category of filtered R-modules to the category of graded R[t]-modules). I think this functor is right adjoint to R[t]/(t-1)⊗-.</p>
<p>The second is R[t]/(t)⊗-:R[t]-grmod→R-grmod, the functor that takes ⊕N<sub>i</sub> to ⊕N<sub>i</sub>/N<sub>i-1</sub>. R[t]/(t)⊗- is left adjoint to the functor that takes a graded R-module to the same graded module, regarded as an R[t]-module by letting t act by 0.</p>
<p><strong>Upshot:</strong> associated graded is not an adjoint functor, so it doesn't have a nice universal property by itself, but it is the composition of a right adjoint functor and a left adjoint functor, which do have universal properties.</p>