Good introductory references on algebraic stacks? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-22T02:14:58Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/2124http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/2124/good-introductory-references-on-algebraic-stacksGood introductory references on algebraic stacks?Daniel Bergh2009-10-23T17:16:08Z2011-10-29T05:51:55Z
<p>Are there any good introductory texts on algebraic stacks?
I have found some readable half-finsished texts on the net, but the authors always seem to give up before they are finished. I have also browsed through FGA explained (Fantechi et al.). Although I find the level good, it is somewhat incomplete and I would want to see more basic examples. Unfortunately I don't read french.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2124/good-introductory-references-on-algebraic-stacks/2140#2140Answer by David Zureick-Brown for Good introductory references on algebraic stacks?David Zureick-Brown2009-10-23T18:07:54Z2009-10-24T01:21:09Z<p>Anton live-texed notes to Martin's Olsson's course on stacks a few years ago. They are online <a href="http://math.berkeley.edu/~anton/index.php?m1=writings" rel="nofollow">here</a>. </p>
<p>My general advice is to learn algebraic spaces first. The point is that the new things you need to learn for stacks fall into two categories (which are mostly disjoint): 1) making local, functorial, and non-topological definitions (e.g. what it means for a morphism to be smooth or flat or locally finitely presented) and 2) 2-categorical stuff (e.g. what is a 2-fiber product). You don't need to do things 2-categorically for algebraic spaces, so it makes sense to learn them first. I believe it really clarifies things to learn these separately.</p>
<p>Also, the formal notion of a stack is a generalization of functor. If you are not used to thinking of schemes functorially (e.g. as a functor from rings^op to sets) it will be hard to wrap your head around the notion of a stack. the The intermediate step of learning to think about geometry in terms of functors of points is crucial.</p>
<p>Knutson's book <em>Algebraic Spaces</em> is very good for the EGA-style content, and its introduction will point you to many nice applications of algebraic spaces that are worth learning and will motivate you to learn the EGA-style stuff. Laumon and Moret-Baily's <em>Champs Algebriques</em> is nice and contains more theorems that just the EGA style stuff.</p>
<p>Its hard to point you any other particular reference without knowing what your goal in learning stacks is. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2124/good-introductory-references-on-algebraic-stacks/2189#2189Answer by AH for Good introductory references on algebraic stacks?AH2009-10-23T21:09:05Z2009-10-23T21:09:05Z<p>I am not sure if the book I am about to suggest is the half-finished text you are hinting at, but there is a book in progress by Kai Behrend, Brian Conrad, Dan Edidin, William Fulton, Barbara Fantechi, Lothar Göttsche and Andrew Kresch. You can find a link to it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.math.uzh.ch/index.php?pr%5Fvo%5Fdet&key1=1287&key2=580&no%5Fcache=1" rel="nofollow">Book</a></p>
<p>It is the most complete reference on algebraic stacks in English that I am aware of. It also has the advantage of being addressed to the beginner.</p>
<p>I think that beyond the basic things, anything deeper you learn about stacks typically involves specific stacks, with certain applications or questions in mind.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2124/good-introductory-references-on-algebraic-stacks/2220#2220Answer by Thomas Riepe for Good introductory references on algebraic stacks?Thomas Riepe2009-10-23T23:28:32Z2009-10-23T23:28:32Z<p>I find the <a href="http://books.google.de/books?id=jWPT4gQF3oMC&pg=PA15&lpg=PA15&dq=%22review+of+algebraic+stacks+and+Artin%27s+method%22&source=bl&ots=oyUAVueuka&sig=MzSa3kIljJtDbQ0OYNxnHlBCgxA&hl=de&ei=wDviStLgNMfG_gbQu6yQAg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAgQ6AEwAA" rel="nofollow" title="Faltings/Chai's review">"review of algebraic stacks and Artin's method"</a> in chapter 1 of Faltings, Chai "Degeneration of abelian varieties" very nice. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2124/good-introductory-references-on-algebraic-stacks/2222#2222Answer by Dinakar Muthiah for Good introductory references on algebraic stacks?Dinakar Muthiah2009-10-23T23:43:40Z2009-10-23T23:43:40Z<p>Dennis Gaitsgory is currently running a graduate seminar with a website <a href="http://www.math.harvard.edu/~gaitsgde/grad%5F2009/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. There are quite a few notes and references on there about algebraic stacks. You should first look at the notes from the second and third talks.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2124/good-introductory-references-on-algebraic-stacks/2225#2225Answer by Grétar Amazeen for Good introductory references on algebraic stacks?Grétar Amazeen2009-10-24T00:05:50Z2009-10-24T02:21:39Z<p>There is an open-source textbook on stacks being created. You can find it <a href="http://www.math.columbia.edu/~dejong/algebraic%5Fgeometry/stacks-git/" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
<p>It's already more then 1400 pages long!</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2124/good-introductory-references-on-algebraic-stacks/2227#2227Answer by Greg Muller for Good introductory references on algebraic stacks?Greg Muller2009-10-24T00:22:45Z2009-10-24T00:22:45Z<p>There was an MSRI summer school on stacks and deformation theory a few years ago. The video of all the talks are online, at <a href="http://www.msri.org/calendar/sgw/WorkshopInfo/419/show%5Fsgw" rel="nofollow">the workshop's webpage</a>. There are several copies of notes around, I believe they are on Ravi Vakil's webpage somewhere.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2124/good-introductory-references-on-algebraic-stacks/5587#5587Answer by Alberto García-Raboso for Good introductory references on algebraic stacks?Alberto García-Raboso2009-11-14T22:25:07Z2009-11-14T22:25:07Z<p>It might not be the best reference for a systematic study of stacks and some of the terminology is old, but Mumford's "<a href="http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/~brussel/mumford.html" rel="nofollow">Picard Groups of Moduli Problems</a>" (1965) might be a nice complement. It explains why stacks came to be and does a few calculations to show their usefulness.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2124/good-introductory-references-on-algebraic-stacks/5606#5606Answer by Charles Siegel for Good introductory references on algebraic stacks?Charles Siegel2009-11-15T04:56:33Z2009-11-15T04:56:33Z<p>I have to follow Alberto's answer with Deligne and Mumford's <a href="http://www.numdam.org/numdam-bin/fitem?id=PMIHES%5F1969%5F%5F36%5F%5F75%5F0" rel="nofollow">paper</a> on irreducibility of the moduli of curves.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2124/good-introductory-references-on-algebraic-stacks/5607#5607Answer by Harry Gindi for Good introductory references on algebraic stacks?Harry Gindi2009-11-15T06:01:58Z2009-11-15T06:09:52Z<p>Vistoli's notes on descent, grothendieck topologies, fibered categories, and stacks at <a href="http://homepage.sns.it/vistoli/descent.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://homepage.sns.it/vistoli/descent.pdf</a> are not only just a really good introduction to algebraic stacks, they're some of the best notes I've ever read on any subject. What I really liked is that he took the time to not identify f*g* with (gf)*, which makes the proofs longer, but absolutely rigorous. </p>
<p>He starts with a review of category theory and classical scheme theory, then builds up grothendieck (pre)topologies, then builds up the notion of a fibered category, which is a generalization of a presheaf, then defines stacks in terms of fibered categories and descent. What's really great about this approach is that once you see how fibered categories work, Lurie's approach to higher topos theory ((infty,1)-categories generalize categories fibered in groupoids) makes a good deal more sense. I can't recommend it enough.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2124/good-introductory-references-on-algebraic-stacks/16247#16247Answer by David Steinberg for Good introductory references on algebraic stacks?David Steinberg2010-02-24T08:52:19Z2010-02-24T08:52:19Z<p>Linked below is a note written by Kai Behrend whose first section gives a concise introduction to stacks, building them directly out of (lax) functors from the category of affine schemes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.math.ubc.ca/~behrend/cet.ps" rel="nofollow">http://www.math.ubc.ca/~behrend/cet.ps</a></p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2124/good-introductory-references-on-algebraic-stacks/79401#79401Answer by Lennart Meier for Good introductory references on algebraic stacks?Lennart Meier2011-10-28T15:41:48Z2011-10-28T15:41:48Z<p>I always found <a href="http://www.icmat.es/seminarios/langlands/29.05.09/gomez-article-stacks.pdf" rel="nofollow">Algebraic Stacks</a> by Tomas Gomez to be a very readable quick introduction. It is virtually without proofs but explains on 34 pages the most relevant definitions and constructions and discusses the example of vector bundle in some detail. He has both the definition of a stack as a sheaf of groupoids and as a category fibred in groupoids in it. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2124/good-introductory-references-on-algebraic-stacks/79451#79451Answer by Peter Toth for Good introductory references on algebraic stacks?Peter Toth2011-10-29T05:51:55Z2011-10-29T05:51:55Z<p>You might take also a look at this:
<a href="http://staff.science.uva.nl/~heinloth/SeminarStacks.html" rel="nofollow">http://staff.science.uva.nl/~heinloth/SeminarStacks.html</a></p>
<p>especially the references and more especially the last two paper of them.</p>