Reference for Unitary Group attached to $E/k$ - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-21T16:49:56Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/20339http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/20339/reference-for-unitary-group-attached-to-e-kReference for Unitary Group attached to $E/k$Dipramit Majumdar2010-04-04T22:55:13Z2010-04-05T07:05:15Z
<p>Unitary groups are very important objects in the setting of Langland's Conjecture because of the existence of Shimura Variety ( which I don't know) and also because people know how to attach a galois representation to a automorphic representation of unitary groups in almost all cases (By the work of Taylor, Harris and many others)(Which also I don't know).</p>
<p>I was trying to learn about unitary groups attached to $(k,E,D,*)$ where say $k$ is a totally real field,$E$ CM field of deg 2 over $k$, $D$ is a central simple algebra of rank $n^2$ over E, and $*$ $k$ algebra anti-involution of 2nd kind on $D$ (i.e. coinciding with the action of non-trivial element of $Gal(E/k)$ on $E$).</p>
<p>But I could not really find a reference for this. Essentially some authors define it a inner form of a particular quasi-split unitary group, and some authors define it as functor of points. Also it is commented that there is some sort of Global-Local patching going on.
Can any one give me a reference where unitary groups is covered in some what details rather than a overview in 2 pages?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/20339/reference-for-unitary-group-attached-to-e-k/20340#20340Answer by Matthew Stover for Reference for Unitary Group attached to $E/k$Matthew Stover2010-04-04T23:12:57Z2010-04-04T23:12:57Z<p>Scharlau's book, <em>Quadratic and hermitian forms</em>, gives the complete classification in Chapter 10.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/20339/reference-for-unitary-group-attached-to-e-k/20368#20368Answer by Paul Broussous for Reference for Unitary Group attached to $E/k$Paul Broussous2010-04-05T07:05:15Z2010-04-05T07:05:15Z<p>For discussions on forms of classical groups you can look at:</p>
<p>-- André Weil, Algebras with involutions and the classical groups, J. Indian Math. Soc. 24 (1961), 589-623 (also in Oeuvres Complètes).</p>
<p>-- Platonov-Rapinchuk, Algebraic groups and number theory, Ac. Press, 1994.</p>
<p>-- The book of involutions, AMS Coll. Publ., vol. 44, 1998.</p>
<p>-- Kneser, Lecture on Galois cohomology of classical groups, Tata Inst. of Fund. Research, Bombay, 1969.</p>
<p>I've written a summary of Weil's theorems and proofs (following Platonov-Rapinchuk) in </p>
<pre><code> http://www-math.univ-poitiers.fr/~broussou/formesgc.pdf
</code></pre>
<p>It is in French ... and only deals with local base fields. </p>